The Battle Performance of Smmothbore Flintlock Muskets

Hard Ball

New member
In November we had an interesting discussion of the performane of 18th-19th century flint lock muskets. But muskets were desinged fo use en mass in major battles, not as individual weapoms
Just how effective were they under these combat conditions.The basic unit in battle was a unit of 500 to 1,000 men called a battallion, a regiment, or a demi-brigade depending on the country.
The best data I have is on the British Army. At the time of the Napoleonic wars a British battalion consisted of ten companies. a headquarters and a band,
Two of the companies were called flank companies and might be detached on special duties. THe eight battalion companies fought together in a line formation which was two men deep. (other countries formed up three or four men deep, thus "the thin red line")
In the battalion companies only privates and corporals carried muskets. A full strength company had 88 muskets. These were the weapons that were actually fired at the enemy. Battalions in the field seldom had the authorized strength. The average during the wars against Napolean was 500 men armed with muskets
Tests conducted in England around 1800 against a long rectangular canvas target representing a hostile battallion showed the following results:

At 100 yards 53% hits
At 200 yards 30 % hits
At 300 yards 23% hits.

The British infantry did not normally fire at ranges greater than 100 yards.
How fast could they fire?
In the British army well trained soldiers were expected to fire three rounds per minute. British soldiers went into action with 60 paper cartridges per man. The high rate of fire ( three rounds per minute) was used only during the critical moments of the battle. The rate of fire fell off as more and more shots were fired and the muskets were fouled by black powder residue.
So if you were a French soldier marching at a British battalion you could fecieve three volleys each sending 500 545 grain .735 inch diameter lead balls into your unit. The effect was that of a giant sawed off shotgun. No wonder casualties were high.
Oh well, those were the good old days!
 
One of the tragedies of the U.S. Civil War was that the weapons had improved, but firing standing up was still necessary with muzzle loaders. The firing was not from .75 caliber smooth bore muskets but from .58 caliber rifle-muskets, capable of aimed fire at 200 yards or more. The results were murderous.

Jim
 
Jim is right. Rifled Muskets shooting Minne 'balls" actually bullets came into use in the 1850s. They allowed accurate aimed fire at 200 to 300 yards. In the early days of the Civil War tactics had not changed and casualties among attacking infantry units were terrible.
 
During the Napoleonic times, French tactics called for artillery bombardment after which clouds of skirmishers (voltigeurs, trailleurs) would precede any advancing column. The skirmishers would harass their enemy and attempt to fix them into position. It would also permit the he supporting column(s) to approach into a favorable position, reform into a line formation to face the enemy line and exchange broadsides under favorable circumstances (more on this below).

Now, the ideal situation called for calvary to advance first. Unless formed into a square, infantry formations are vulnerable to calvary. Supporting the calvary would be the horse artillery which would ride up, unlimber, and fire into the densely packed square. If properly timed, the French Infantry column could then advance, form into a line and fire into the square. Now, considering that the frontage of a line formation is greater than that of a square (given two equal size opposing units), it would be a one sided battle.

Wellington, the supreme tactician, fully appreciated this and nullified French tactics by keeping his infantry out of sight. This was done by deployment on the reverse slope of a hill. This also reduced their exposure to the "grande battery" which Napoleon favored. To defeat the trailleurs and voltigeurs, the British deployed riflemen (Portugese Cacadores, 95th Regt Rifle Brigade, 5/60 Royal Americans, and riflemen of the King's German Legion) and light infantry (originally the French armed some skirmishers with rifles, but this practice was discarded by Napoleon). Thus, rather than dominating the forward edge of battle for their advancing columns, the outskirmished French were disadvantaged. It wasn't until they were too close did they realize exactly where the British were. By that time, the head of the French column would be decimated by the vaunted British volleys as described by Hard Ball.
 
4V50 Gary's description of French tactics in the Napoleanic wars is a very good one.
Frech skirmishers were a real threat to infantry fighting in linear formations. One of the two flank companies in a British infantry battalion was a light infantry company which usually was deployed as skirmishers in front of the British battalion line formation to counter the French skirmishers. They were equipped with a shorter lighter version of the Brown Bess musket. If faced with a major French attack they would fall back to their battalion and join the formation forming up on the left flank of battalion line. That was why they were called a "flank company."
 
Back
Top