The Awakening - Chris Matthews on Brian Williams' show

Oatka

New member
A tip 'o the hat to poster RhettButler on the Free Republic board for painstakingly typing up this transcript.

Do I see scales falling from his eyes? "We have laughed in the big cities -- I should say, among journalists -- about the black helicopter image of a federal police force, or even a UN force coming to grab their guns or take them away. We've always laughed at that. Well after this picture today -- no one can laugh at that picture because it's real." No $h!t Sherlock.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a390221b408ce.htm#1

TRANSCRIPT OF CHRIS MATTHEWS' COMMENTS ON MSNBC

from MSNBC today, approx 10:52 AM PST

BRIAN WILLIAMS: ... we are joined by Chris Matthews, the anchor of the broadcast Hardball on MSNBC. Chris, a lot of political issues are raised by this, and uh, let's not uh go softly on this next one. There are a lot of Americans walking around this morning seeing this as akin to -- you name it -- uh Ruby Ridge, Waco, lumping it altogether with what they see as a seven-year Clinton administration that has at various times infringed on the rights of Americans and uh uh prompted armed incursions into uh private homes and property -- and this is only going to add fuel to that very conservative, uh, almost the patriot movement wing of of power.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Well Brian I've been listening to you all morning and I agree completely with that, that observation. I think it's going to be the big fact that survives this whole question of whether Elian should go home or not or what the courts decide.

It's the image that people have of their own government here in Washington -- the sense of a government as being benign and on the side of the people. A government that's compassionate, as George W. Bush likes to say. A government that's centrist and reasonable. Or a government that when it acts, acts brutally and quickly, and acts with almost impunity as to what's going to be in its way in terms of human sentiment, of of a family's concern for one of their children.

The pictures they're going to create. I disagree with those who get too technical about this in terms of the firearms and how the trigger was -- in terms of the man's fingers, the officer's fingers. People are going to see that picture all around the world and they're gonna say 'this is what the US government looks like in action'.

Now they're gonna blame Janet Reno for a few days, but she's not running for anything this Fall. Eventually the people in Montana and Wyoming and Idaho and all the parts of the country that are very concerned about the federal government -- I hate to limit it to those regions, because if you s-- as you have said this morning, I think very effectively, it's not just a few people that are worried about the power of this government, that have seen it at Waco, at Ruby Ridge. They see it at tax time, they sense its presence. And here they have a vivid description of their Pres -- of their government as a brutal military force coming to yank them out of their beds in the middle of the night.

We have laughed in the big cities -- I should say, among journalists -- about the black helicopter image of a federal police force, or even a UN force coming to grab their guns or take them away. We've always laughed at that.

Well after this picture today -- no one can laugh at that picture because it's real. When the federal government moves under this administration, under this Attorney General, perhaps in these times, it moves swiftly, dramatically, and it uses military force -- to the highest degree visible! I mean I've never seen a kid facing an automatic weapon in my life like that!

And I think that's gonna be the iconic memory of this, and it's gonna haunt not just this next election, but -- I think you're right -- years to come.

WILLIAMS: So Chris it's no uh surprise then that we've got a White House spokesman uh addressing comments during the briefing to, quote, "those in charge of disseminating these pictures", urging caution on the part of the news media, denying Mark Knoler's question -- that this represents a heavy use of force -- that there were only eight agents in the house.

MATTHEWS: Well, I think the picture will tell a thousand words. And I think that the White House knows that and they fear -- I'm sure the president of the United States is more skilled than any of us at observing the political consequences as they unfold.

This story I think is packed with unintended consequences, but I think this is the one that you are right to report on right now -- whatever the White House is saying shouldn't be reported on.

I think that image certainly -- when they collect the pictures of this decade which is only begun, they're going to have that picture at the top as the main picture of the decade perhaps.

I think it's something to watch politcally. I think Al Gore is probable counting -- gonna look for the first poll to come out of Florida to decide what the damage is. But the larger damage is not in one state or one set of electoral votes but it's what we think of our government and how we imagine it -- at its worst.

WILLIAMS: Uh Chris uh sixty seconds left -- Al Gore's statement is, 'I thought all along this should be handled through the family court and with the family coming together.

Thank goodness the people of Miami are keeping the peace.' How will that be seen?

MATTHEWS: Well, when Richard Nixon ran in 1960 he was bamboozled by a press question to the President at the time, Dwight Eisenhower -- 'What decisions has the Vice President influenced during the last eight years?' It's clear that Al Gore, whatever his position politcally might be, whatever he's putting out in his press releases or saying to the voters, has no influence whatever on how Bill Clinton acts in a case that Al Gore got so deeply involved in.

So clearly whatever he thinks or positions himself politically -- however he positions himself, it clearly was ineffectual. And I think that will also be observed by the voters.

------------------
The New World Order has a Third Reich odor.

[This message has been edited by Oatka (edited April 22, 2000).]
 
The Emperorer is nekkid as a damn jaybird!

------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!
 
Where is Bush?
Where are ALL the Republicans?
Where are our members of Congress?

Why are they not outraged?
Or are they all part of the problem?

------------------
Either you believe in the Second Amendment or you don't.
Stick it to 'em! RKBA!



[This message has been edited by Dennis (edited April 22, 2000).]
 
I think Matthews is right as rain.

Note - I originally made a sarcastic comment about the Republicans ... but, I have to give them some credit. They are not silent - see this link from the Drudge Report for one source: http://news.excite.com/news/r/000422/14/elian-republicans

This photo today will be right up there with so many memorable shots - the Navy sailor, kissing the girl on VJ day; the Vietnamese girl, running naked away from a napalmed village, etc.

Too bad there weren't any photos like this at Waco, or Ruby Ridge ... or, were there ...?

The bottom line for government is always violence and brutality. And, they will always counsel civilians that violence is wrong. When governments are just, I recognize the reality of justice. When they are unjust ... well, then we have what we see with the Clinton administration. And, I would say we're only in the 2nd inning on this game.

I can only hope that the liberals who have supported this man will someday realize their error. I'm not optimistic, and besides, it probably won't matter by then.

[This message has been edited by Jeff Thomas (edited April 22, 2000).]
 
Jeff:

To follow up on your theme - government is the only institution in our society that we allow to use deadly force to compell action. Corporations can't do it. We don't allow tobacco companies to point a gun at your head and force you to smoke. McDonald's can't make you eat a Big Mac. Same for individuals. Point a gun at someone inappropriately, and you go to jail.

Government, however, does it all the time. It's not always as obvious as today, when we have such vivid images fresh in our minds, but its always there. For example, you pay your taxes because of the threat of men with guns coming and taking you to jail.

Government is force, plain and simple.

It behooves us to be very careful with whom we give this power. We as a society have obviously blown it big time.

JimR


------------------
The ultimate purpose of gun control is to render people incapable of the ultimate form of protest and resistance to tyranny.
 
Dennis: "The chilling picture of a little boy being removed from his home at gunpoint defies the values of America and is not an image a freedom-loving nation wants to show the world," he said, putting the blame, as other Republicans did yesterday, on the "Clinton-Gore" administration.

As Gore has had to juggle his two roles, Bush has seized the Elian drama as a campaign issue. "When Elian's mother gave her life to bring her son to the land of the free, she could not have possibly dreamed that it would have come to this," he said. "Ours is a nation of laws, not guns. Custody disputes are resolved in the calm of a courtroom, not in the terror of middle-of-the-night raids."

George W spoke out quickly.

Dick
 
I actually have some hope after hearing the outrage about this incident. Can you imagine the kind of press the govt. would get if they stormed into dozens of homes of law-abiding citizens to sieze weapons and people were wounded or killed? If the public is angry now, how will they react to a more sinister scenario?
 
Rock_Jock, The public outcry over Jack Boot thugs shoving an Assault Weapon in the face of a 6 year old is pure only because there were no arms in the house. If they had found even a 22 plinking rifle, then Dyko Reno would have been "justified" in her agression. When they come for our guns, the public will be convinced that they are lawfully going after dangerous Gun Nuts. We (NRA, GOA, JFPO) must take advantage of this situation now and mount a Real Advertising and Public Relations effort to further expose the tyranny of our Federal government for what it has become.
 
I am a wet blanket here. I don't think revulsion against the government action will benefit the RKBA. People are repulsed by the MP-5. Do you think that will transfer to a position that civilians should have them also?

I think not. In fact, by making a point about that evil assault gun probably would convince more people that such guns should be abolished for the cops and US.

Don't expect most folk to say the solution was for the Cuban community to duke it out with assault rifles against the Feds.

Seeing such weapons prime aggressive thoughts and responses against all users of such weapons. This has been demonstrated in the psychological literature (sorry for quoting this for my favorite hater of my profession).

One should be careful about presenting this case as a direct cause for the RKBA as the general negative affect against guns could be transfered to us.

Better to make the case about abuse of power at this time. That will cause general disbelief of government positions. That's psychology also.

I don't Matthews is moving towards the RKBA rather just increasing his distrust of government.
 
Glenn..I don't think you're a wet blanket here at all, your point about some peoples thinking regarding firearms is true, however I think the salient point in Chris Matthews segment was:

"We have laughed in the big cities -- I should say, among journalists -- about
the black helicopter image of a federal police force, or even a UN force coming
to grab their guns or take them away. We've always laughed at that. Well after this picture today -- no one can laugh at that picture because it's real. When the federal government moves under this administration, under this Attorney General, perhaps in these times, it moves swiftly, dramatically, and it
uses military force -- to he highest degree visible!"

The RKBA suffers most from the inability of most people to see the need for it, along with the rest of the BoR in fact. I believe this is so primarily because people are either asleep or believe the Gov't is there for their greater good or both. Matthew's tears the roof off that complacency and belief regardless of his stand on RKBA. Take away the MP5 and stick a revolver in his hand and 'The Picture' is no less disturbing.

Chris..
 
I still wait for Matthews to say that he supports the RKBA. He knows the issues. He used to be a cop and his brother is a righteous NRA member according to Chris.

I want him to say that the government wants to take guns away from all lawabiding folk and his opposes it.
 
I remember Matthews interviewing a pro-gun spokesman (can't remember his name). When it came to RKBA, Matthews asked (paraphrasing),
"What do you need guns for, the last time I looked, there weren't any red coats around (snicker)."

I'd like to spoon-feed him that statement, letter by letter, mixed with a healthy dose of castor oil, as I make him watch the assault one more time.

------------------
The New World Order has a Third Reich odor.
 
Oatka, I remember a Chris Matthew's show from last year when he was interviewing someone from HCI. He got to talking about Australia, England, etc. and said, "so the NRA is right.
You guys want to take all the guns away from Americans." He had the guy on the ropes for a bit.

Matthews is no friend of RKBA, but he does a pretty decent job of interviewing. I sent him a letter last week asking that he have a few more pro-RKBA people like John Lott, Larry Pratt or Wayne LaPierre on his show to help balance the debate. It was a very polite letter, but whether it has an effect...?

Dick
 
Were are the Liberformers...durn it....were are they......Have they spoken out yet...have there politicians ....spoken?????....Are they marching in the streets?....were are the self righteous in this....or are they part of the problem...remember perot....gimme a break...fubsy.
 
About black helicopters. About this time last year, my wife and I went to visit my daughter in Utah. At the Nevada/Utah border, we were stopped by FEDERAL officers, who were inspecting all vehicles going into Utah. There were about 40 officers, all in their ninja suits and at least 30 of them had MP-5's There were two Black Helicopters parked to one side with the pilots sitting inside, ready to fly. One looked like a Hughes 500 and the other was an HU-1 "Huey" with mini-guns mounted.
I asked what was happening and was rudely to "None of your business!"
Welcome to the police state, courtesy of our Commie in Chief.
Paul B.
 
Back
Top