The AR World is Nonsensical: Here’s My Latest Contribution.

R

rickyrick

New member
Ordered a 20” .450 Bushmaster upper by Radical from Primary Arms along with a carry handle sight by AeroPrecision and a Troy Battlesight HK style fixed front sight (non-flip)
I thought the upper came with a magazine, but I guess they don’t on the ones sold through PA. I have one coming from Bushmaster. I guess I could hand-feed some cartridges in it until the magazine arrives.
According to my research, this cartridge can be temperamental in feeding from a magazine, so I am anticipating having to do some tweaking in the future.
I have temporarily orphaned my 24” bull barreled upper for this project (a previous nonsensical project)
It’s the first complete upper that I have purchased, so fingers crossed. I’ve always assembled them myself.
Anyway here is the beast, looks ok so far. No fancy finish or anything. Made in Texas, so that’s a bonus… maybe lol.
I will probably use the carry handle on a different gun later on, after I get any kinks out. Hopefully I can fire it this weekend, but I may be preparing for the arctic plunge heading this way.

170c83c66ad120e4e48823b27857b714.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I love the Panzer muzzle brake, one reason I bought a Radical upper in 458 SoCom. I use ASC mags for the 450 Bushmaster and they work fine. Go ahead and try a 5.56 mag, because I think the only difference is the follower. I bought some 450 followers to convert regular AR magazines, but it’s been 5 or 6 years and I don’t remember if I used them or not.
 
Thanks for the tips, this is my first foray into big bore or single stack AR calibers.
I will probably order some followers soon.

I weighed choosing one of the bottle neck cartridges as a project, I’m really not going to be shooting long ranges in the near future. If I do, I have non-AR .308 rifles.

I landed on .450BM because of factory ammunition availability for now.
 
When I had one, I used the USGI 20 round mags with a replacement follower as well, and they worked just fine, no feeding issues.
 
I do like the "Panzer" style muzzle brake.
Click to expand...

But, does it need it? The cartridge doesn’t look that BIG.
Panzer Thing is making me flinch by just looking at it.

Signed,
Feeling Apprehensive
 
Panzer Thing is making me flinch by just looking at it.
Click to expand...

Really? it ought to be having the opposite effect. :D

IT adds a few ounces of steel, and reduces felt recoil. Plus, I think it looks cool, reminds me of the brake on the production model Panther tank (Pz V)

Since its already there, I wouldn't bother removing it, it doesn't hurt anything and might even help.

Remember the round fires a 250gr slug in the 2200fps range. That is neck and neck with a factory loaded .358 Win and only a couple hundred fps slower than a .35 Whelen or .350Rem Mag with the same bullet weight.

The bigger bore (.45) will change the feel of the recoil, and so will the straight line AR stock. Overall, I'd be glad to have a brake, and not so happy without one.

Interesting tidbit, the panzer style muzzle brakes were not installed for recoil reduction. They do that, some, but that was an added benefit, not the primary purpose. Their main benefit, on the tanks and anti-tank guns was redirecting some of the muzzle blast to the sides and not raising as much of a dust cloud directly in front of the muzzle. This allowed the gunner to get back on target a little faster. Same reason you find birdcage type flash hiders "clocked" with a solid bottom, so as to raise less dust and debris when fired close to the ground (prone).
 
Really? it ought to be having the opposite effect.
Click to expand...

I was being a bit tongue in cheek there due to the aggressive look of it.

I learned about muzzle blast kicking up dust back when I was killing coyotes with a Mini14 from the prone position.
I ended up installing a brake without ports in the bottom for that very reason. (At least I thought I installed it)
Funny thing, unnoticed to me, the roll pin hole for the brake was in the wrong position for the rifle and I ended up launching it into muzzle brake Valhalla two years later :D

Hopefully I can get out and fire the upper tomorrow, will certainly try it this weekend if only to test the functionality of it.

I do like the brake, won’t be removing it. Shooting it should be fun, it’s completely new to me.
 
rickyrick said:
But, does it need it? The cartridge doesn’t look that BIG.
Panzer Thing is making me flinch by just looking at it.

Signed,
Feeling Apprehensive
Click to expand...
“Need” has nothing to do with it. I just think it looks cool, and badass. I pick a lot of my AR accessories just for aesthetic reasons.
 
“Need” has nothing to do with it. I just think it looks cool, and badass. I pick a lot of my AR accessories just for aesthetic reasons
Click to expand...
Roger that, was mostly joking around, I like how it looks too.

We used to just call it "Winter". Nice rifle.
Click to expand...

I live on a creek in the forest that drains into a bayou… 7 degrees is cold to us lol. Busy packing the well house with hay hoping it doesn’t freeze
 
Well just got finished test firing and it’s a short stroker.
Will try again with a carbine lower before doing anything else.

The recoil isn’t bad at all, probably due to the Panzer thingy, haha.
Let family members have a go at it, even though it was basically a single shot. My 5’1” wife didn’t complain either, but the A2 stock was awkward for her.
The concussion was pretty impressive though
 
You might consider one of the collapsable multi position buttstocks for the wife's use. Just be sure to get one that doesn't have a "cheese grater" buttplate. Something rubber coated without sharp metal edges would be best.

Even a home made rubber pad, slipped on or glued on will turn something that "bites" into something much more comfortable.

Good Luck with the short stroking issue. Could be the gun isn't correctly "balanced" between gas amount and recoil system, or it could be its not set up right for the ammo you are using.
 
I’ll try a carbine lower, I have several.

I prefer rifle buttstocks but I found that they don’t always cooperate with some calibers and gas lengths.
It’s not the end-all if I need to use carbine stocks and buffer set ups.
I have a few buffers of various weights and I also have tungsten weights. I suspect a standard buffer will do the trick, if that’s what fixes it. Of course I’m gonna give the gas block a look over too.
 
The recoil wasn’t bad at all, I’d dare say that it might be on par with my 10.5” 6.8spc, of course it’s considerably lighter than the 450 and it has no brake, just a 6” flash can pinned and welded. I’ll do a side by side one day and see.
Either way, the 450 recoil wasn’t near to what I was anticipating. I guess the panzer brake did it’s job.
 
I think the cartridge was developed using a carbine buffer and spring. My 450 build was also short stroking and I traced it down to an unusually stiff recoil spring, not sure where it came from as I have a couple drawers of AR parts and most are not in original packaging. Once I installed the standard carbine buffer and spring it worked fine.
 
I was thinking that might be the case, seems like most ARs run carbine buffers and springs theses days. Of course, that’s just the view from my corner of the room.
 
It is still short-stroking with a carbine lower and standard buffer, however it is cycling a little better. Will feed 2-3 rounds on its own but fails to pick up new rounds often.
Also will not completely lock the bolt open on empty mag. It will catch the bolt carrier but not the bolt.
I also took an empty buffer with me with no better result.

My next step will be to pull the gas block and check for alignment, but may end up drilling the gas port. Drilling the port seems to be the winning solution with these rifle length 450BM uppers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top