Terrorists and other "bad guy" types must be hysterical over this

alan

New member
Dress Code May Hinder Their Work, Air Marshals Say
By BRIAN WINGFIELD

Published: July 17, 2004


WASHINGTON, July 16 - Beards are out. So are jeans and athletic shoes. Suit coats are in, even on the steamiest summer days.

That dress code, imposed by the Department of Homeland Security, makes federal air marshals uneasy - and not just because casual clothes are more comfortable in cramped airline seats. The marshals fear that their appearance makes it easier for terrorists to identify them, according to a professional group representing more than 1,300 air marshals.

"If a 12-year-old can pick them out, a trained terrorist has no problem picking them out," said John D. Amat, a spokesman for the group, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association.

Documents and memorandums issued by the Department of Homeland Security and field offices of the Federal Air Marshal Service say air marshals must "present a professional image" and "blend unnoticed into their environment." Some air marshals have argued that the two requirements are contradictory.

Federal air marshals must have neatly trimmed hair and men must be clean-shaven, the documents say. Some of the service's 21 field offices have mandated that male officers wear suits, ties and dress shoes while on duty, even in summer heat. Women are required to wear blouses and skirts or dress slacks. Jeans, athletic shoes and noncollared shirts are prohibited.

In April, the officers' group sent a letter to members of Congress saying that the "military-style grooming standards and a blanket 'sports coat' dress policy," along with conspicuous boarding procedures, jeopardize the safety of air marshals.

At least two airline industry unions, the Allied Pilots Association and the Association of Flight Attendants, have publicly backed the assertions of the officers' group.

A spokeswoman for Senator Herb Kohl, Democrat of Wisconsin, said that he became aware of the issue when The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel contacted his office after one of its reporters spotted several air marshals in the Milwaukee airport. The spokeswoman, Lynn Becker, said that the senator was working with the director of the Federal Air Marshal Service, Thomas D. Quinn, primarily to address the boarding procedures, but that they were also discussing the dress code issue.

Since May, the Air Marshal Service has changed the check-in procedure for its air marshals, no longer requiring them to sign a logbook when they board.

The Federal Air Marshal Service acknowledges that a dress code for its marshals does exist, but it will not give many specifics, saying that it is "security sensitive information."

However, Dave Adams, a spokesman for the service, said, "There is nothing in the policy that says we have to wear a suit and tie" and "there is nothing in the policy that places our federal air marshals at risk."

Mr. Adams said that the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association "is misrepresenting our dress code policy." Mr. Adams said a dress code was put in place in April 2002 after the airline industry complained that air marshals' attire was too casual. He said some marshals had worn shorts, blue jeans, sandals and T-shirts while on duty.

"In order to gain respect in a situation, you must be attired to gain respect," Mr. Adams said in an interview. He said if air marshals were allowed to be too casual in their dress, "they probably would not gain the respect of passengers if a situation were to occur."

Andrea Houck, 52, who was traveling through New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport this week, said that she thought federal air marshals should be "totally undercover."

"Look around you," Ms. Houck said as she pointed to other passengers waiting in the food court. "Most people are traveling in T-shirts, sweatshirts and khakis." She added: "If I was a terrorist and I spotted someone dressed like an air marshal in a suit, I wouldn't get on that flight. I would get on another one."


Eddy Ramírez contributed reporting from New York for this article.
 
I'll take this a step further . These people have friends and sympathizers in many places . It wouldn't suprise me one iota if they had a copy of the files of every Air Marshall in the program . Pictures , family profile etc. , just as we had on many suspected commies during the cold war .
 
The same thing happened in Northen Ireland, buses kept getting hijacked to be burnt out for barricades etc, so they would put soldiers on 'undercover' only problem being this was the 70's and short hair, clean shaven well dressed men kinda stood out amoung the hippies, so they were naturally very easily murdered - causing a review in policy. Naturally a marshal uncovered in the air will have a far greater effect than someone being found out on a bus, I just hope they dont have to learn that lesson the hard way. If you see the movie 'Serpico' you see about 'undercover cops'
 
jefnvk wrote:

Just another situtation in which someone made a decision who wasn't qualified to make that decision.

Just so. Bean Counters, and others of similar mental ilk should never be permitted to do anythikng beyond counting beans. Operational decisions are obviously far beyond their capabilities.

We should have learned that from Vietnam era Sec. of Defense MacNamara, but seemingly didn't.
 
Federal air marshals must have neatly trimmed hair and men must be clean-shaven, the documents say. Some of the service's 21 field offices have mandated that male officers wear suits, ties and dress shoes while on duty, even in summer heat. Women are required to wear blouses and skirts or dress slacks. Jeans, athletic shoes and noncollared shirts are prohibited.

J. Edgar Hoover is alive & well & running TSA's fashion police... :rolleyes:
 
As I mentioned earlier, isn't it strange how the BEAN COUNTER MENTALITY keeps showing up, in the oddest places?
 
Back
Top