RAfiringline
New member
Every time a terrorist attack occurs, there's rhetoric about not giving in to the fear and bad reactions that the terrorists are trying to create, for their own purposes.
As usual, after any mass shooting, there's talk about increased gun control, with a lot of references to what Australia did in eliminating civilian ownership of high capacity semi-auto guns.
Isn't curtailing / revoking non-terrorist, non-criminal US citizens' gun rights
a form of caving in to fear along the lines that terrorists want?
And, if terrorists and nuts start using vehicles to run over people in crowded places, are we going to curtail car ownership?
As usual, after any mass shooting, there's talk about increased gun control, with a lot of references to what Australia did in eliminating civilian ownership of high capacity semi-auto guns.
Isn't curtailing / revoking non-terrorist, non-criminal US citizens' gun rights
a form of caving in to fear along the lines that terrorists want?
And, if terrorists and nuts start using vehicles to run over people in crowded places, are we going to curtail car ownership?