Terminator wants gun ban to be extended

nralife

New member
Terminator wants gun ban to be extended
Hill News ^ | June 3, 2004 | Michael S. Gerber


http://www.hillnews.com/news/060304/schwarzenegger.aspx

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R), who became a movie star by blowing up and shooting anything that stood in his way, has reaffirmed his support of the federal assault-weapons ban.

In a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) last month, Schwarzenegger called on Congress to renew the ban, which is scheduled to expire in September.

“As you are well aware, Californians overwhelmingly support the ban on these dangerous weapons,” wrote Schwarzenegger, who spoke out in favor of the ban during last year’s campaign for the governorship but has not been very vocal on the issue this year.

“The renewal of the federal ban on assault weapons is a prudent, common sense effort to limit the prevalence and availability of dangerous weapons and protect public safety,” Schwarzenegger added.

“It shows the broad support for this,” said Eric Howard, a spokesman for the Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence.

Feinstein is one of the ban’s strongest advocates in the Senate, where a majority voted to extend it in March. While the ban-renewal bill has some bipartisan support in the House as well, House GOP leaders are unlikely to schedule a vote on it. Some lawmakers may attempt to force a vote through a discharge position.

But such a move could be dangerous for Republicans during an election year. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is strongly against the ban’s renewal, was one of the president’s strongest allies in 2000. But the group has yet to endorse Bush, and his signing of an extension could put it an endorsement in jeopardy.

Chris Cox, the NRA’s chief lobbyist, dismissed Schwarzenegger’s description of the guns covered by the ban as “dangerous military firearms.”

“The letter is factually incorrect,” Cox said. The assault-weapons ban “has nothing whatsoever to do with military weapons.”

While the White House supports the ban, the president has not pressured GOP leaders to act. Gun-control advocates say Schwarzenegger’s endorsement of the ban is another example of the Republican governor breaking from Bush.

“If the president does not step up to the plate, the ban will be terminated,” Howard said.

Schwarzenegger has been quiet about gun issues, some activists pointed out, at times seeming to align with Second Amendment supporters and other times siding with gun-control advocates. The ban has strong support from law-enforcement agencies and is considered popular in California, which has enacted state gun-control laws as well.

Proponents of the ban hope that the famous Republican governor’s support will add momentum to their cause.

“We’re very happy that the governor is taking a public position on this, and publicly calling on the president to take responsible action,” said Howard. “I know the governor is hearing from his law-enforcement constituency and the public.”

Feinstein said, “ I welcome Governor Schwarzenegger’s support in this effort to ensure than the ban is reauthorized and that military-style assault weapons aren’t allowed back on the streets of America. Assault weapons are the weapons of choice for criminals and those seeking to do the maximum damage possible in the shortest amount of time.”

But Cox said the NRA remains confident that the ban will end in the fall.

“This law has had no impact on crime,” Cox said. “In 10 years there’s not one shred of evidence that it’s been effective, and we’re confident that come September this ban will be allowed to sunset.”
 
Someone should remind Governator Arnold Kennedy Shriver that Kalifornia already has a state level assault weapons ban and ask him to point out exactly which of the dogs in this fight belongs to him.
 
No news. Arnie is anti. Always has been.





I'm continually amazed by 2A supporters who assume that Hollyweird action heroes must be good guys because they use guns in their movies. :rolleyes:
 
And just who in this thread was surprised by Arnold being antigun?


He should mind his own business. He has stewardship over California and that is it.
 
Oh, sorry, nralife. Nobody here - it was a general comment. Looking back I see it looks like I was accusing *someone* here of being stupid.


Sorry - it was badly worded.
 
I'm not surprised!!
Arnold had his orders from the DNC!!!
How do you think he got "elected" in the People's DEMONCRATIC Republic!!
 
Oh, sorry, nralife. Nobody here - it was a general comment. Looking back I see it looks like I was accusing *someone* here of being stupid.

Hey, no problem!


Since Arnold wasn't born in the good ol' USA, he can't run for Prez. I think we need to keep it that way! What could Orrin Hatch have possibly been thinking a while back when he proposed eliminating the restriction on foreign-born citizens??

I know, I know.... Hatch is no darling of Conservatives either.... lol
 
Since Arnold wasn't born in the good ol' USA, he can't run for Prez. I think we need to keep it that way!


Speaking as a naturalized citizen myself, I agree!


Of course, we also need to stop this nonsense of letting every child born here after a dash across the border being counted as a citizen.
 
Well, since I'm willing to be mildly inconvenienced rather than give money to the gun grabbers, yes, I did miss The Prophetesses remarks. No doubt they were intelligent, well-informed, and based on a sound understanding of our history, Constitution, and the political philosophy of our Founding Fathers. (Just like everything that comes out of Hollywood, of course.)


Care to enlighten us?
 
In the movie, Arnold was elected Governor and became so popular nationally that the Constitution was amended to allow him to run for President. Of course, he was elected and a big brother dominated, socialist paradise was born. Now, given the current circumstances in California (he is, in fact, the Governor) and the calls from several lawmakers to pass just such an amendment (Orin Hatch comes to mind), I'd say Hollywood may be well on their way to proving once and for all that life does imitate art. Though it is a stretch to call "Demolition Man" art.
 
(Orin Hatch comes to mind)

Ah, yes our "good man" Orrin.

:barf:


Yeah, I can see it happening. He's big and handsome, so he'll get a lot of women voters, and uh, he's big and tough and shoots people, so he'll get a lot of shooter's votes.

Sad but true. :(
 
I am not really surprized that Arnie fooled so many people. But I do recall that cheery picture of him shortly before the "election" of him with Warren Buffet jumping off a helo and being warmly welcomed by Jacob Rothschild at his cozy estate.
 
Fix, I hope you're not implying that we're all going to end up having to dress like that. . . . .



Quartus, you would have enjoyed the message. It was actually a humorous movie in parts, and they worked in Dennis Leary doing his famous freedom rant. Essentially, in the future, they've pacified the whole nation to the point that nobody knows how to deal with conflict on any level anymore. Everybody agrees with everything. Then a really violent criminal from the past gets unfrozen. After Wesley Snipes kicks the snot out of about ten police officers, one of them calls for backup, crying "We're police officers, for pity's sake! We're not trained to deal with violence!"
Thus they're forced to unthaw the ultimate combat athlete, Sylvester Stallone, who takes over and blows stuff up. Luckily, the museums still have lots of guns and they're all loaded. The future folks, who all dress in goofy kimonos and have serious blissninny issues, don't quite know how to take the 20th-century male.
 
Quartus, you would have enjoyed the message.


Sounds like I might have. But I don't enjoy helping - even a LITTLE bit - to fund the anti-freedom activities of Hollywood.


So I don't.


It's called, "sacrifice".


Radical and probably even stupid, I know, to suggest that a person who calls himself a patriot and a 2A advocate actually forego watching a lousy movie or two (or all of them) out of principle.
 
Back
Top