Taxing Terror

LAK

Moderator
And just when the subjects in the province of Europa formerly known as Great Britain thought they couldn't be taxed any more than they already are ....

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1718983,00.html

London bombs
August 03, 2005
Londoners face terror tax to pay for extra police
By Stewart Tendler, Michael Evans and Richard Ford

LONDONERS could face a “terror tax” to pay for Scotland Yard’s battle with the bombers and the protection of millions of travellers.
Householders will see a rise in council tax next spring or a dramatic cutback in police services unless ministers are prepared to find more cash for the force.

The cost of investigations into the attacks on July 7 and July 21 is already running at £500,000 a day as 1,000 officers, often working 12-hour shifts seven days a week, hunt the terrorist masterminds.

Detectives are being drawn from other operations, including fighting London’s crime barons and high-profile murders to relieve tired officers.

At the same time police are committed to a massive security operation as the threat level remains at its second highest amid concern that another terrorist cell is poised to strike.

Despite 37 arrests since July 21, security chiefs have set the threat level at “severe specific” and say that there is no alternative to maintaining “appropriate” police patrols in London.

The result is that Scotland Yard, British Transport Police and the City of London Police are daily deploying hundreds of officers across London in a high-visibility operation.

Each Thursday their ranks are swelled to 6,000 officers, many armed, as they patrol the Underground and mainline rail systems at a cost of more than £2 million.

Metropolitan Police finance chiefs are already trying to calculate the burgeoning bill which is eating into reserves of £14 million saved from last year and an extra £14 million given by the Home Office in April for counter-terrorism operations.

Within days of the first bombs Sir Ian Blair, the Commissioner, knew that his force would be stretched, not only for manpower but cash, and approached ministers.

A senior spokesman told The Times: “We are in consultation with central government for extra funding. Obviously we have not got infinite resources and we will have to find the money from somewhere.”

Home Office officials say that ministers would look at any approach under a system that allows special grants to be made in unusual circumstances. However, if the crisis is lengthy the Treasury will become involved and officials say that there may not be much room for manoeuvre.

The Treasury has agreed to pay £14.6 million for Operation Bracknell, the response to the tsunami on Boxing Day last year, but has little other spare cash.

Len Duvall, the chairman of the Metropolitan Police Authority, said he hoped that ministers would rally to help but admitted that a rise in the precept was possible.

“I am optimistic. We are facing a different situation than we have ever faced before. It is a complex situation which has implications for other forces and I expect government will recognise this,” he said.

Last year householders on Band D in London paid £184 for policing. This year the figure rose to £196 and is already certain to rise again to meet the cost of wage increases.

On top of that there will be an increase of about 28p a week to meet the cost of the Olympics in 2012.

For Sir Ian and his senior officers the headaches over cash are only part of their problems. Manpower in local boroughs and specialist teams is steadily being stripped to maintain the counter-terrorist effort.

Tarique Ghaffur, the Assistant Commissioner in charge of major detectives covering organised crime and murder, disclosed yesterday that work was down to a “trickle” on a number of high-profile cases.

They include new investigations into the murder of PC Keith Blakelock during riots the Broadwater Farm Estate riots in Tottenham in 1985 and the murder of Rachel Nickell on Wimbledon Common more than ten years ago. The investigation into the murder of Amélie Delagrange in West London has also slowed.

Mr Ghaffur said that between 300 and 470 officers had been taken from his units for counter-terrorism duties. He said: “Quite clearly there could be long-term implications if this level of abstraction continues. The Met is stretched and this is going to continue for a while.”

He said that gun crime has started to climb again and the murder detection rate is falling. New drives against drug dealers are also being cut back.

Copyright 2005 Times Newspapers Ltd
 
LAK...
Again, full marks for finger pointing and tut-tutting.
A failing grade for suggesting reality based solutions.
The terrorists are quaking in their boots.
 
gburner,

I could offer a number of solutions. In fact you have seen enough of my opinion on this and related subjects to know that I stated that there are a few basic things that need to be done before we can ever have a hope of reducing our current problem and enjoying some stability again. So your comments are rather stupid, whether you share any of my ideas on the problem or not.

But I do not have to offer a solution to a problem simply because I recognize it as a problem to begin with. We have people in and around a government with their fat hands on the helm, and they are in control. They are steadfastly running a course, and have made it obvious they have no intention of changing it, our shipwreck or not.

And I will continue to point out their folly and lies. If enough people do finally realize what criminals these people are at the helm and the game they are playing, and their support base dwindles to nothing - then perhaps we have a chance for change.
 
LAK...
The only posts I have ever read of yours deal with one subject only...'How Badly America, Americans and American Foriegn Policy Sucks', with a not so healthy, paranoid side of 'We're all Slaves on the New World Order Plantation', all served in a nice tinfoil beanie.
Not one word have I read from you offers ANY positive solutions for dealing with the issues of the day.

"I could offer a number of solutions...but I do not have to offer a solution to a problem simply because I recognize it as a problem to begin with." Well, heavens no, old boy. That would require that you take a stand, do some analytical thinking, post your resulting suggestions and see if they'd sell in the marketplace of ideas. That requires a bit of work, character and the ability to possibly see yourself as WRONG. Pish and tosh. So much simpler to graze through whatever rag strikes your political fancy, regurgitate a cut and pasted article or two and trumpet that the content must be true because it supports whatever cocked hat theory that you're espousing at the time.

So glad that you're on our side.
 
Then you have not read many of my posts on border controls, visas and immigration - to name just one topic. Or you have a mental disorder. Which is it?

Now this gal knows how to wear a sheenie beanie - she just "doesn't know what she's talking about" ;)

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • thatcher3.jpg
    thatcher3.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 81
I've got a great idea!

Instead of the that we'd spend on our armed police - who let's face it, aren't "trained" in any way that most US LEOs would consider enough - let's not even mention SWAT - why don't Londoners spend the money on a Glock and a bit of range time?

Oh, hold on... sorry, I forgot....
 
gburner,

The America-haters are at the helm knowingly selling it out and running it into the ground. Their contempt for America, it's founding principles, ideology, and independence is plainly obvious in what they say, do and do not do.
 
Back
Top