Taurus 94 Opinion wanted

I

IM_Lugger

New member
They seem to be pretty cheap, are they any good?

How would they compare to, say Buckmark Camper, I know they are very different guns, but which one is better quality.



also, any other recommendations for a cheap target rimfire?
 
The last I knew, Taurus had dropped the 94/941 due to problems. Extraction was the main issue. Just say no. The better 22 revolver is the S&W 617/648.
 
I've only owned one Taurus 94, 3" stainless model... it was a great little revolver... not a S&W 63, but close.
 
I owned one. Always fired and extracted. SA trigger was excellent. I sent it back to Taurus when it was new to have them rework the DA trigger stroke. Got it back and didn' see much difference. Fired it tons live and dry to try and smooth it out but never really saw any improvement. Best .22 I ever had or fired was an old used S+W 422. They can be found used under $200, I've seen one as low as $150. Nothing fancy but I always found it hard to miss with.
 
Look at the Taurus Tracker in .22 I've had one for a week or two now. I've only gotten out once with it, but it seems nice.
 
I had a stainless with four inch barrel (sold) and an ultralite snubby (still have). Both were well-made, well-finished, and reliable. The double action trigger is heavy but the single action is fine. I think the 94 in .22lr is a good value and fun to shoot. I imagine that the 94 in .22 mag is also good but I haven't shot one. You can get greater accuracy with a good single action auto in .22 with six inch barrel. I have the SW 2206 and like it very much. Prices are comparable (excellent used 2206 versus new 94). One could also consider the Harrington and Richardson .22 break open revolver with six inch barrel. Also fun. All of the Taurus and HR nine shot .22s use the same HKS speedloader.

Drakejake
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top