Kentucky Rifle
New member
Much to my wife's dismay, I keep old gun magazines. I had this affliction when we married almost 25 years ago, and I was honest with her about it. She said it was fine. However, all these years later, I sometimes notice magazines go "missing in action", so I've taken to hiding the ones I wish to keep.
In the Mar. 2001 issue of "Handguns" there is a review of the S&W 331 .32 H&R mag. The magazine gives the weight as 12 ounces.
In the July issue of the same magazine, it gives a review of the Taurus 731UL. (Which I purchased. As far as I know, the boycott is still on.)
It seems that the main difference between these two pistols is that the S&W has a titanium cylinder and a slightly shorter barrel. Yet, incredibly, weighs in at five ounces lighter. How can this be? There's not much difference in the outward appearance of the two pistols at all.
Thanks,
KR
P.S. Sorry friends. Not knowing things like this drives me nuts!
In the Mar. 2001 issue of "Handguns" there is a review of the S&W 331 .32 H&R mag. The magazine gives the weight as 12 ounces.
In the July issue of the same magazine, it gives a review of the Taurus 731UL. (Which I purchased. As far as I know, the boycott is still on.)
It seems that the main difference between these two pistols is that the S&W has a titanium cylinder and a slightly shorter barrel. Yet, incredibly, weighs in at five ounces lighter. How can this be? There's not much difference in the outward appearance of the two pistols at all.
Thanks,
KR
P.S. Sorry friends. Not knowing things like this drives me nuts!