Alright, i just found this forum and have already love it. I am gonna be buying either a taurus 44mag in S.S with 6 1/2" barrel. Model 44 "not raging bull" or a 454 in the taurus with a 8 3/4" barrel. Why these models- well i live in california and the guns have to meet exact ruling by the departement of justice.. Here is the question-which one would you all go with? It will be used as a protection gun while hunting in California. I currently own a ruger security six in .357 mag- load it with 180 grain winchester partition golds. This gun does not affect me with recoil. Feels like no problem shooting the 180 grains. Will the 454 rip my damn arm off- and do I really need one that big? So you probably asking why am I changing. Was deer hunting-got a stupid idea to hang in manzinita in thickets where i had seen deer 2 days before. No deer this day, just a 400 black bear that thought i was a deer came out about 15 feet from me. Scared the crap out of me- never been so close to a bear. When he relizied i was a man and not a deer., he took off. Sure got me thinking i would have rather had a bigger gun on my side. In the worst case scenerio, if i would have had to shoot, would the 44 mag hve worked if i had 300 grain bullets? Or should i take a man pill, and get the 454? Any suggestions would be great. I am open to any and all ideas. Why the taurus-simply because of cost.ohh ya, i have never fired a 44 or 454-solaugh at me, but hey -at least i am honest. Thanks