Tannerite vs. ballistic gelatin

Andrew Wiggin

New member
The gelatin I use for testing was getting really opaque so I decided to "retire" it by blowing it up with tannerite.

Even though it still calibrated correctly, it was too dark to see wound tracks well so it was time to mix up a new batch. This was just a fun way to dispose of the old batch.

Hold my beer and watch this!
 
Cats are carnivorous quadrapedal mammals that have been widely domesticated.

Buzz_Killington.jpg


Did you watch the video?
 
In Utah its a felony to be under the influence and in possession of a loaded firearm, and I actually agree with that law. You're putting an image out there that most of us don't need. I drink beer, I shoot, but not at the same time.

Maybe I'll catch some heat for this post and maybe not, but maybe next time think about the image you're putting out for all gun owners before you post on a public site.
 
In Arizona, it is not and I don't belie that it should be. One should not face prison simply for possessing a weapon while drinking. People should not be punished for what they might do, only for what they have done. Likewise, one should not have to cede their right to defend themselves simply because they had a couple beers.

That said, I was not intoxicated and I don't believe that a person should handle firearms if they are intoxicated.
 
In Arizona, it is not and I don't belie that it should be. One should not face prison simply for possessing a weapon while drinking. People should not be punished for what they might do, only for what they have done. Likewise, one should not have to cede their right to defend themselves simply because they had a couple beers.
I could not agree more, and while I find the law here frustrating, i.e. lower than .08 for driving, but .00 for carrying a gun, I carry while on my own property, regardless if I've had a drink. I don't really give a rip what the holier-than-thou types say.
 
It's also #but# surprising that the state of Utah would take a hard line statist position with liberal control regarding anything concerning alcohol.

ETA: sorry, I typed badly. Should read "not surprising".
 
Last edited:
It's also but surprising that the state of Utah would take a hard line statist position with liberal control regarding anything concerning alcohol.

Not surpising at all to me: the Powers That Be are teetotalers......
 
It's also but surprising that the state of Utah would take a hard line statist position with liberal control regarding anything concerning alcohol.
If that is so, then you don't know much about Utah.

For starters, the majority religion is entirely holier-than-thou.
It's one of only two places in the U.S. that still has post-prohibition regulations in place on beer. (3.2% ABW)
All alcohol (and beer with greater than 3.2% ABW) is tightly controlled by the State, and only available at State-owned and State-run liquor stores (or a minuscule number of licensed wine shops).
And, almost anything fruity or "girly" is essentially banned. (Because it "appeals to children and teenagers".)

Utah is a place that, until 4 year ago, when you ordered a Long Island Iced Tea, they would ask which two liquors you wanted in it. ....Because that's all that was allowed by law - no more than 2 types of liquor (and two ounce maximum) in any given beverage.
And if you ordered a round of beers for your table.... Everyone had to finish their current beverage, get up, and walk to the bar, because you can only have one 'alcohol container' per person, at any given time. ...AND the bar tender was the only person authorized to check IDs and hand over the booze (which had to be poured behind a "mormon partition" so that families and children would never see alcohol being prepared - even in a bar :rolleyes:).


That's just the tip of the iceberg, and just alcohol-related laws.
Utah is a special place. There's a reason that most people familiar with the state joke that it is its own country. ;)

Terms like "Utah unloaded" and "Utah roadblock" come to mind...




As for the matter at hand, I agree with Cornbush.
 
Personally, I don't have problem with a guy taking a sip of beer and shooting his rifle. But, we as gun owners and users need to always be aware of how the antis perceive our actions. Because I like the video doesn't mean that the average you tube watcher will approve.
I don't like the anti gun sentiment, but we must be aware of it and be cautious how we represent ourselves.
The antis will use anything they can to make us the bad guys. Alcohol and firearms shown together give the antis more credibility.
 
I understand your position and I agree to an extent. On the other hand, we haven't won anything by appeasing the antis and we never will. We have won by not giving a crap and getting in their face like gay rights activists. I'm done being nice.
 
Back
Top