Take the Libertarian Purity Test

Status
Not open for further replies.
112. But I was reading into the questions alot.

I like it.

Later,
Chris

------------------
"TV what do I see, tell me who to believe, what's the use of autonomy when a button does it all??" - Incubus, Idiot Box
 
160; That was too easy, all the right answers were "yes". Mind you, I would have prefered some of those to be essay questions; "Yes, but gradually." wasn't an available answer.

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis!
 
well, crap...I only got an 85. However some of the questions I felt need something besides 'yes' or 'no'. Such as abolishing immigration laws...well, I feel they should be stronger with harsher punishment for illegals. Giving a 'yes' or 'no' answer means opening the border or closing the border-not sure of which or if whoever is running the test has the same view as I.

couple of questions the wording were vague and since I didn't answer I got a 'no' on them. Interesting test overall.

------------------
Satanta, the Whitebear
Sat's Realm: <A HREF="http://SatantasRealm.tripod.com/Entrypage/entrypage.html

My" TARGET=_blank>http://SatantasRealm.tripod.com/Entrypage/entrypage.html

My</A> Disability petition: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/DisbHelp/petition.html
 
(Little, tiny voice) I took it. I didn't do well at all.
(Slinking off stage right - always to the right! :D :D )
 
Shin-Tao: That's what I mean by essay questions. Yeah, we'd eliminate the military... as it exists today. No standing army, in other words. That doesn't mean that in a libertarian vision of the world we wouldn't be armed to the teeth. We'd bring back the militia system.

Part of the problem with this stuff, is that when you talk about it, people envision it happening abruptly, when what's being advocated is a goal to be arrived at over potentially a very long time. Took a long, long time for the government to get this big, and in the process it destroyed a lot of private institutions which provided the services it provides today. Those institutions have to be re-built, in some cases re-invented, as the government is pared back.

Some things the government does, like the war on drugs, or the war on guns, could simply be stopped, like that, with minimal disruption. Other things? The government sure as heck shouldn't be running a Ponzi scam, but there are a lot of people who could have provided for their retirements, and didn't, because the government took their money, and promised them Social "Security" in return. Can't just stop mailing those checks, so we have to work out a way of gracefully ending the system. Best proposal I've heard was to sell the federal government's land holdings, in excess of what's needed for enumerated functions like national defense, and buy annuities.

I guess what I'm saying is that even the 160 pointers like myself don't see the government as something that could be abolished over night. In fact, I'm not entirely sure it could be completely abolished, but that strikes me as a reasonable goal to strive for.

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis!
 
I scored a 94. I only voted yes to stuff I could agree to, with reservations. The test needs other answers besides just yes or no.

Most things in life end up in the "gray area"
between yes and no, where more choices and a deeper look are required.

There is almost every thing wrong with our Federal Government.
Representatives that dont represent us but instead do what pays then the best.

Fed Govt "OUT OF CONTROL" stomping all over the Constitution and not understanding "on purpose" that what shall not be infringed
says ,it really means.

The Fed Govt have been out to screw "We The People" since 1913 and have reciently accellerated their agenda and are tightening the screws. Therefore, Unintended Consequences become more likely.

We the People are getting feed up and thensome, at least those of us with our eyes open.

I dont have even a few of the answers but things need to change and in Nov. , they will, for better or for worst.
 
Yup, I agree, strict "yes" and "no" answers didn't allow me to express how I really felt. I ended up with a score somewhere near 70. Is that better, Dennis? :D

------------------
Refuse to be a "helpless" victim.
Knowing Your Rights WAGC in Indiana

[This message has been edited by Blueyedog (edited July 10, 2000).]
 
Blueyedog,
A 69 isn't bad.
(Moving right along...)

Privatizing the post office used to sound good to me. Now, however, the post office seems preferable to what I've read here about UPS and FEDEX.

Same thing with privatizing highways. Can you imagine toll booths every 20 miles in the interstates? With different rules for truckers?

I need to know a lot more about implementation of some of these privatization concepts.

(Blueyedog, don't you do it! I can hear you thinking!! :D )

------------------
Either you believe in the Second Amendment or you don't.
Stick it to 'em! RKBA!
 
I ended up with a 49.I don't agree with the milita consept of the military.This would have worked 75 yrs ago but with the high tech now I don't think this could be done.It takes a full time person to do it.Many things are not black and white.The test is a black and white test with no room inbetween.I don't many answers but I don't think you have them all either.
Bob

------------------
Age and deceit will overcome youth and speed.
I'm old and deceitful.
 
I ended up with a 99.... Got to some of the high point questions such as getting rid of all government.... Naw... it is a necessary evil.... Lost out on all the immagration questions.... Sorry, but we need to close our boaders.... there ain't much elbow room left. Although I support cutting our military back, we still need to maintain a good base of officers. Also left our police in place... I see a need for specialization in this area. Although I would like to see the police cut way back. Only need a few for investigation. Leave the driving to the citizens.

At any rate, guess I am a hard core.



------------------
Richard

The debate is not about guns,
but rather who has the ultimate power to rule,
the People or Government.
RKBA!
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Shin-Tao:
Eliminating the military? Are you crazy?

Scored 90.
[/quote]

You could read it different ways. Original intent was no standing army, and we could get along fine without a standing army, and we wouldn't be sending our soldiers to far off lands to be killed. That doesn't mean we would be defenseless.
 
This test was very poorly put together. Many of the issues are not even close to being "yes or no" answers and are terribly complicated with incredible indirect consequences. Many of the other notions are just plain ridiculous: Private law?, Abolish the state? no taxes?

Forgive me but this is nothing more than anarchy. Why even enter into civil society if this if what you want?, you'd be better off living in the woods. This state of existence would truly be one of war between everyone. Those that were stronger would hire their own thugs..I mean Police to enforce their law. This would soon evolve into a state of complete slavery, having nothing to do with Liberty.

Dismantle the military and abolish the state! The Chinese would take over the country quicker than they took over Clinton's retirement plan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top