I have not shot a 50 without a brake. Suppressors are efficient at muffling sound. Recoil reduction is a negligible side effect, but nothing like a brake will accomplish. I would not be the guinea pig on a 50 with no brake, suppressed or not.Thoughts from anyone with experience. I’m looking to suppress my 50 BMG. Does recoils dramatically increase? The only BMG suppressor with an intigrated brake is the Barrett. Should I save up for the Barrett or go with any of the other options?
I've always been under the impression suppressor reduce felt recoil because they slow down and dissipate the hot gasses escaping the muzzle.
I was thinking "oil barrel" myself.[visualizing a suppressor the size of a 5-gallon bucket, that renders the BMG only slightly louder than a bare .308...]
[visualizing a suppressor the size of a 5-gallon bucket, that renders the BMG only slightly louder than a bare .308...]
44 AMP said:Slowing the exit of powder gas will slightly reduce the "push" against the muzzle when the gas exits. However I think this effect is insignificant from the perspective of felt recoil.
When a gun is fired, the explosive gas that propels the bullet will exit the barrel right behind it. This is part of what causes recoil. When using a suppressor, that explosive gas is trapped and dispersed through its internals before finally exiting the muzzle of the unit. That brief trap and dispersal of the gas will reduce the energy it has upon final exit, which reduces felt recoil.
44 AMP said:I think the reduced recoil you're feeling is due to the fact that you've added weight to the rifle.
What does a "regular" suppressor weigh??