super eagle vs M2

W

wacki

New member
Does the split receiver on the super eagle have any disadvantages? Theoretically speaking, I would think it could cause some problems with reliability.
 
Also, comparing costs:

Benelli M2 Field (12 Gauge, 21", 3") - ComforTech Stock, Matte Synthetic Finish
Stock # [BN11026] $1,039.00
http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/pro...30734&osCsid=9f7d6fe05c0b5cd305742a76f360e816

Benelli Super Black Eagle II w/ ComforTech (12 Gauge, 24", 3 1/2") - Matte Synthetic Finish
Stock # [BN10026] $1,339.00
http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/pro...30685&osCsid=9f7d6fe05c0b5cd305742a76f360e816

I'm not sure I can see a good reason to spend $300 more for what my be an inferior product that is merely easier to clean. Feel free to correct me.
 
I've never heard of problems inherent to the two-piece receivers. The decision between the two, is more a matter of chambers. If you need 3.5", go with the SBE. If not, the M2. (If you're getting a Benelli.)
 
Last edited:
How you feel the split receiver is inferior???

On Benelli's
I have hunted with my SBE I (H&K model) going on 10 years now. It has been on countless hunts here, in other states, as well as Alberta, and Manitoba.
It has been nothing but reliable in all kinds of conditions from 100 degree heat to below zero goose hunts.
The SBEII I bought two years ago, and the Cordoba I bought at the same time, are just as reliable.
The M2 and M1 20ga my wifes shoots, have been reliable as well.

The SBEI/II can fire 2 3/4. 3" and 3.5" shells, and have split receivers which makes cleaning a snap.
The M1/M2 can fire 2 3/4 and 3" shells, and have a solid receiver.

It depends on what the owner wants.
Neither design is in any shape, form, or fashion, inferior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top