Hillary is now courting the 'Super' Delegates to secure to nomination should she lose the primary. 1 in 5 Democrat delegates (20% aprox. 800) are 'Super' delegates.
If the democrat party utilizes their ’super’ delegates to select (not elect) Hillary as their nominee then they will not only alienate all those Obama supporters and usher in a Republican, but they will manifest in truth the lie they propagated in 2000 that the President (in this case the nominee for President) was SELECTED not ELECTED.
Why do Democrats even have ’super’ delegates when the Republicans have no such manipulative means in place to subvert their party members’ choice for a nominee? Is there any reason past ‘protecting the party’? Protecting it from what, it’s members?
Here's a link to the list and their endorsements so far: http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html
I don't know about the credibility or accuracy of this list but the site seems to be pro-Democrat and is a convention watch site for Democrats to use so I didn't smell any bias.
If the democrat party utilizes their ’super’ delegates to select (not elect) Hillary as their nominee then they will not only alienate all those Obama supporters and usher in a Republican, but they will manifest in truth the lie they propagated in 2000 that the President (in this case the nominee for President) was SELECTED not ELECTED.
Why do Democrats even have ’super’ delegates when the Republicans have no such manipulative means in place to subvert their party members’ choice for a nominee? Is there any reason past ‘protecting the party’? Protecting it from what, it’s members?
Here's a link to the list and their endorsements so far: http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html
I don't know about the credibility or accuracy of this list but the site seems to be pro-Democrat and is a convention watch site for Democrats to use so I didn't smell any bias.