I've got to be honest - as rude as it is when people make a post explaining why a particular item for sale is a bad deal, I'm tempted to more often than I should be, and I think it's in turn rude when people are taken aback when I have PM'd them what I feel is a fair offer lower than what they wanted. While a fan of free markets, I think in a community like this, it would be nice to help both the people who wish to sell their items faster at a reasonable price by helping them discern what price it would sell at, and the folks who pay more for a used gun than a new one would've cost them. I think a lot of this stems from the discrepancies in markup from state to state, but I don't think that just because someone got a bad deal the first time around they ought pass that bad deal forward to the next owner. Being from Illinois, it's particularly frustrating, as guns seem to be considerably more expensive there, and I do feel it's a shame when I see people pay $450 for a used gun that goes for $350 new over at CDNN, or scoff at an offer on a used gun that is a mere $50 less than what you could come by a new one for in one of the group buys. Has there ever been any thought given to trying to level the playing field by posting some sort of gun valuation tutorial in the respective forums where the wheeling and dealing goes on? I know this is contrary to the seller's interests, but I think (with all due respect) that we've got a lot of people around who aren't terribly internet savvy and stand to get burned because they don't know how to do the "smart shopper" thing.