Students to receive payments in drug raid settlement

Wildcard

Moderator
Students to receive payments in drug raid settlement
Associated Press

CHARLESTON, S.C. - Students searched during a 2003 drug raid by police at Stratford High School are eligible for compensation of between $6,000 and $12,000 apiece, now that a federal judge has approved a $1.6 million class-action settlement.

U.S. District Judge Patrick Michael Duffy approved the settlement Monday in a lawsuit filed against the Berkeley County School District and the Goose Creek Police Department by families of students affected by the raid.

Surveillance videotapes captured the raid in which officers drew their guns, ordered students to lie on the floor and used a dog to search them for illegal drugs. Police found no drugs and no arrests were made. About 140 students were at the school at the time.

The students will split $1.2 million and their attorneys' will receive the remaining $400,000.

Also, Goose Creek police will be required to obtain a warrant before searching students on campus, according to the settlement.

Typically, officers have not had to obtain warrants or show probable cause to search students on campuses, said Graham Boyd, an attorney with the America Civil Liberties Union, which represented some of the students.

"That is, by our analysis, why the problem in Goose Creek happened," Boyd said. The police took advantage of more lenient rules and abused that discretion. (The settlement) gives to the students of Goose Creek a set of protections that is as robust as the protections adults enjoy."

Students involved in the drug sweep must file claims by July 28, said Marlon Kimpson, one of the attorneys for the students. A court-appointed claims administrator will determine which students are eligible for the money.

"It is now incumbent on the students to take action and have their claim considered," Kimpson said.

The exact amount each student receives will depend on the final number of claims.

Since the raid, the school district and the Goose Creek Police Department have changed their policies for drug sweeps.

"You must conduct drug searches according to the U.S. Constitution," Kimpson said. "This settlement and this class-action lawsuit is notice to police officers and school officials across the nation that students don't shed their constitutional rights merely by entering a schoolhouse door."

Kimpson said many of the firm's clients have said they plan to use the money to pay for college or additional education.

The case drew national attention as a result of the videotapes. The Rev. Jesse Jackson led a protest march amid accusations blacks were unfairly targeted.

Following an investigation, state Attorney General Henry McMaster called it "highly inappropriate" for police to draw their guns but concluded their actions did not warrant criminal charges.

Goose Creek is about 20 miles northwest of Charleston.
Information from: The Post and Courier, http://www.charleston.net

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/local/15013766.htm

Lets see. Cops screw the pooch, and the taxpayers foot the bill. I would like to see the cops that were involved in this, involved in any way, shape or form, pay dearly. The fine coming out of their pockets. Jail time.

Following an investigation, state Attorney General Henry McMaster called it "highly inappropriate" for police to draw their guns but concluded their actions did not warrant criminal charges.

Highly inappropriate for LEO's to draw their weapons, but if it was you are me, it would be called Assault with a deadly weapon. Hey, they only want to help get rid of drugs, its only our civil rights, its alright. If they mess up, taxpayers will pay the tab....:barf:
 
Look at the glass as half full, WC.

Those taxpayers will vote. They will elect the Mayor, Town Commission and, perhaps, the Police Chief. They now have a chance to change Policy and Staffing with those elections.

Plus, each is now more sensitized to the issue of enforcement action gone bad. They also vote in National Elections.

The glass doesn't always have to be half empty. ;)
Rich
 
The glass doesn't always have to be half empty.

I will endeavor to look at if from your point of view. I honestly will try, however, I know all to well, that the majority of people have an attention span less than my ferret.:cool:
 
It's always good to see the resolution of problems such as this. I remember all too well how the two sides of this situation battled each other... Both on the boards and in real life.
Wildcard: I know all to well, that the majority of people have an attention span less than my ferret.

Rich:Then they deserve to be led into servitude.
I have a rational fear that this may be more than a prophetic vision... Rather, a Judgment of deserved national damnation.
 
Then they deserve to be led into servitude.
During the Revolution, only about 1/3 of the people supported independence. I don't see where those numbers have changed much since. 2/3 may deserve to be led into servitude, but the 1/3 who don't will put up the most resistance and will subsequently suffer first and hardest for that reason.
 
I could be wrong, but don't most departments have to carry insurance policies to pay for lawsuits? In that case, it would only be the deductable coming out of the taxpayers pocket. But I doubt that anyone involved is going to keep their jobs.

On another note, it is good to see a precedent set for students rights. During the late '90's and early '00's your rights, especialy the 1st and 4th were left at the front door(the second obviously does not apply).

Why did the cops draw their guns anyway? Someone shoot a spitwad at them?
 
If they have insurance that pays it....you can bet they will be getting a new company or the premium is going to go up.
 
Back
Top