Stray Bullets From Range Hit Home

B

BarryLee

New member
The Caldwell family of Carrollton, GA was awarded a judgment against Advanced Bullets Gun Range after claiming that over a ten year period 27 stray bullets hit their home. Apparently the Jury agreed awarding the family $175,000 the Judge also ordered the range closed until the NRA can conduct a safety review and make recommendations to the court. The family reports that they spoke to the range owners, but the problem continued.

So, sort of hard to believe this problem could continue without the range owners taking some action. I’m curious what the specifics are and if members/customer were violating some procedure that contributed to the problem. Either way I guess it shows the need for responsible range management, liability insurance and a good backstop. Also, it is nice to see the NRA getting a little good press, but the negative image the range appears to be presenting probably outweighs that.

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/couple-awarded-175k-lawsuit-over-stray-gun-range-b/nYT7p/

http://www.advancedbullets.com/
 
While 27 bullets over 10 years doesn't sound like much, it really only takes one. I guess the range owners felt that 2-3 stray bullets a year wasn't enough to worry about, IF the family was telling thr truth. I guess the range learned differently.

Rule 4 might just apply here...
 
I was once helping another person check out a range with the idea of adding on an "Action Pistol" range, and trying to figure out where on the property to put it. In going behind the pistol berm which was quite tall, I was surprised to fiind many bullets all over the ground. Luckily it is quite a ways to the first house there, but the potential was there for real problems, and needless to say the Action Pistol range was finally placed in another location. From the close proximity to the berm of most of the bullets, I would guess maybe richochets that went pretty vertical?
 
Last edited:
If there's stuff behind the range, Murphy's law dictates bullets will hit it at some point.

There's uninhabited land for miles behind the range where I shoot.
 
Some years ago here in Virginia a homeowner was trying to force the Issac Walton League ranges to close. It had been there for many years, the houses were new.

Shereported that a bullet had come through her living room window and narrowly missed hitting her.

Police investigated and found that she had apparently dug a bullet out of the ground and used a slingshot to fire it through her window.

She didn't get her wish of closing down the range.
 
Whether the house was built before the range was set up or after, it doesn't really matter. Fired rounds should never leave the range...
Click to expand...

You are 100% correct. It doesn't matter if the stray bullets are hitting a house, a car, a pedestrian, or what ever. They should NEVER leave the range.
 
We had an outdoor range on Hillsborough Ave. in Tampa, Fl. some years ago when it was the only thing around that area. The next thing you know subdivisions were built up all around it and poof, no more range. Residents complained of stray bullets from the range they built a house next to and they win. Amazing. Why does shooting seem to be a constant battle with one thing or another?
 
They are pushing to get a range near my families property in WI closed. It is mainly used by LEO's or private training companies and the chief complaint besides noise is that when LEO's shoot steel targets you actually end up with fragments(not whole rounds but small fragments) landing close to nearby homes.

I don't know how you fix that little issue.


I don’t understand how the backstop isint high enough to stop this, I guess now I see why so many outdoor ranges require at least one RSO around at all times.
 
I lived by a range on the Nth side of Boulder, CO(many anti gunners.) The gun range is old.. older then all the 90s condos and custom homes. They were always calling the police with false reports of bullets wizzing by, chips in windows, reports of "machine gun fire".

It is kind of funny because some people really don,t have a clue and call in about their house getting shot from "stray bullet" and they will be 5-7 miles away.

I have never heard of one that turned out to be true, but they keep calling and keep trying to get the range shut down.
 
WNY_Whitetailer said:
Whether the house was built before the range was set up or after, it doesn't really matter. Fired rounds should never leave the range...
Click to expand...
While I wholeheartedly agree that fired rounds should never leave the range, from a legal liability perspective, "which came first" can matter very much. If the house was built after the range, the range and insurer could argue that the homeowner assumed the risk of stray bullets by building there with full knowlede of the range's existence.
 
People don't like the noise, and try to shut these places down after they move in, knowing that the range, and noise was there prior to their home. Same thing has been happening to small airports for decades due to urban sprawl.

They use perceived "danger" from bullets to make the argument when the real reason is noise.
 
That house was shot up with way too many holes. I can understand one stray in ten years, but the news video showed bullet holes throughout the house. Passed through walls and everything. The range had to do something to prevent that.
 
I agree, something was wrong with the design of that range, most likely the berms were not high enough or wide enough. The home appeared to receive direct hits, which means these were not mere ricochets. If the berms were high enough, you might get an occasional ricochet that falls to the ground or roof, but not direct hits. Something was wrong here.
 
The berms need to be higher. Yet, it still seems odd to me that the berms line up along a paved road (I'm assuming that's the case). I've never seen that before.
 
Bullets sometimes leave well constructed firing ranges because shooters and range staff are not attentive to basics. IME: Guys fire weapons that are not sighted in: The bullet hits the ground well short of the berm, ricochets and goes zinging over the berm.

Example: The berm of the former private weapons range at Ft. Sill was the wide base of a 200 foot high hill at about 110 meters from the firing line. Muzzleloader bullets were impacting the ground short of the 50 meter line. Those bullets were going over that 200 foot hill and hitting a parking lot, buildiings and autos. The range was closed.
 
Last edited:
Punisher_1 said:
...Why does shooting seem to be a constant battle with one thing or another?
Click to expand...
This really isn't about shooting. It's about a basic legal principle of very broad application. It is usually thought to derive from the 1868 ruling by the British House of Lords (which is the British equivalent of our SCOTUS) in the case of Rylands v. Fletcher (BAILII Citation Number: [1868] UKHL 1):
... The same result is arrived at on the principles referred to by Mr. Justice Blackburn in his judgment, in the Court of Exchequer Chamber, where he states the opinion of that Court as to the law in these words: "We think that the true rule of law is, that the person who, for his own purposes, brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril; and if he does not do so, is primâ facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape. ..."...
Click to expand...

In other words, in general if you engage in potentially dangerous activities on your property which could harm your neighbors, you are responsible if those activities do harm your neighbors.

deepcreek said:
....some people ...call in about their house getting shot from "stray bullet" ....

I have never heard of one that turned out to be true, but they keep calling and keep trying to get the range shut down.
Click to expand...
Sometimes claims are bogus.

Here there was apparently a trial and the claims were determined to be genuine.
 
The range to which I belonged was closed for a year, after a bullet was found near a broken window in a business park built downrange of the club.
It was interesting to tour the business park, which was the only construction for hundreds of yards in either direction, but directly downrange of the club; was that particular lot cheaper than those up or down the road, because it was downrange of the club?
I agree that there's no excuse for rounds getting out of the range, but I also thought that a broken window and a bullet was insufficient evidence. I would have liked to go on the roofs of the buildings, to see if any bullets landed there?
An analysis of the bullet showed no glass on it, and I figured someone hit the window with a hammer and dropped the bullet nearby.
Local news broadcast from another neighbor of the range, who'd found a "bullet" in her yard. The reporter and the neighbor looked sort of silly, holding a live cartridge.
The range did eventually reopen, but with sufficient restrictions that they could no longer host USPSA or IDPA, which was the reason I'd joined.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top