<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Paul Morceau:
Just wondering how state rifle associations are in other states. We have GOAL Gun Owners Action League in Massachusetts. Without GOAL Mass gun owners would really be up the creek. The folks at GOAL have had a tough time getting gun owners active to protect their rights, but this year GOAL is giving us an opportunity to come together.
What made me curious was reading the bios for the folks running for the NRA board. Quite a few indicated they were involved in their state associations.
[/quote]
Paul,
This is a pet peeve/personal crusade of mine. I strongly believe that every firearms owner and sportsman should belong to at least three separate organizations.
1. National level. Belonging to a national level organization helps support efforts in that arena to combat federal transgressions against firearms owners and Second Amendment rights. This used to be fairly simple when the NRA was the only national group. GOA does provide an alternative, however I personally feel that having two competing organizations only dilutes our forces. But is does provide another venue for those who cannot bring themselves to join and support the NRA for whatever reason.
2. State level. Every state should have an organization dedicated to supporting state-wide firearms competition, sporting uses, and political action. Since many of the oppressive laws we have seen are from state governments, you need someone in the state to fight them. This organization should be aligned with the NRA, not just from my personal preference but for the fact that the NRA is still the only national group which promotes firearms safety training, organized competition, and nation-wide grassroots activism. But the important thing is that there IS a state organization supporting that state's firearms owners and sportsmen.
3. Local. Every firearms owner should be a member of the closest range or club which supports shooting activities. Part of the reason is to insure the continuation of places where honest citizens can safely and legally shoot. Once you lose a gun range, you will almost certainly never get it back. The other is to associate with other like-minded citizens and provide local opposition to increased restrictions and restrictive laws.
We all need to support work at the local, state, and federal levels to protect our rights. The failure of a majority of firearms owners to do this is one of the big reason anti-gun forces have been as successful as they have been. We need to work just as hard as the anti-gun people are or our Second Amendment rights may soon be just a dim, politically incorrect memory.
Frosty
[This message has been edited by FPrice (edited September 15, 2000).]