Nightcrawler
New member
As my deliberating on which handgun I want to buy goes on, I came across the Ruger KP90, priced $459.99 at Gander Mountain. The gun is solid, beefy, and built like a tank. It fit my hand well (YMMV), the controls were ambidextrious, and I liked the safety options (decock, or decocked and locked).
I hear the Rugers are strong and reliable. I have questions.
Will the gun be able to stand a steady diet of +P ammo? It was built for 10mm originally, wasn't it?
Can it fire .45 Super without damaging it?
The same store gave me a price quote for the CZ97B: $574.99. So, between the two, and their pros and cons, the Ruger is the winner. The Ruger has the ambi safety, costs less, has plenty of aftermarket parts and stuff for it, and isn't so huge (It's no bigger than a government model, and has 1/2" less barrel to boot).
Any reason I shouldn't buy the Ruger? The price seems in tune with what I'll be able to spend in June when I turn 21. (I've got college bills to pay yet).
I hear the Rugers are strong and reliable. I have questions.
Will the gun be able to stand a steady diet of +P ammo? It was built for 10mm originally, wasn't it?
Can it fire .45 Super without damaging it?
The same store gave me a price quote for the CZ97B: $574.99. So, between the two, and their pros and cons, the Ruger is the winner. The Ruger has the ambi safety, costs less, has plenty of aftermarket parts and stuff for it, and isn't so huge (It's no bigger than a government model, and has 1/2" less barrel to boot).
Any reason I shouldn't buy the Ruger? The price seems in tune with what I'll be able to spend in June when I turn 21. (I've got college bills to pay yet).