Howdy, all.
In college, I traded all my guns (a cool 870 with an 18" barrel, extended mag, and wood furniture, a Ruger Mark III, and a 6" Taurus .357) for a Springer Mil-Spec. There is no need to tell me how bad this trade was, but I did need a carry gun, and the Springer fit the bill nicely.
Well, it shot like crap, brand new out of the box. I couldn't get a 5" group at 7 yards. I talked to the owner of the shop, and he said the .45 cartridge was too powerful for me to handle. Now, without sounding picky, I am a big boy - 6 foot, 250. I LIKE shooting .44 mag, and .357. I shoot my pt-22 and Beretta Jetfire, with two inch barrels, more accurately than this.
Later, I moved to another state. I asked the guy who owned our range to shoot with my gun. He did, and he grouped awfully, but said military spec guns shot like crap, and it was as good as I could ask for.
I later decided to start 'amateur gunsmithing'. I figured the 1911 was a great platform to learn on, and I had one I didn't care about - I found other guns to carry, because that Springer don't hit the broad side of a barn.
So, I disabled the ILS lock on the Springfield, slicked up the internals, learned how to detail strip it, installed a new mainspring housing and spring, etc. Minor stuff. And I was learning about accurizing...I measured the ID of the barrel bushing, and the OD of the barrel, and it was about .001 difference, and then I was reading about how to fit a match barrel. And evidently, proper fit of the slide to frame is essential.
I found a guy who has a Springer that looks just like mine. Is this type of fit bad? I can actually see daylight through this (pay attention to the left side of the fitment). Does this need to go back to Springfield?
In college, I traded all my guns (a cool 870 with an 18" barrel, extended mag, and wood furniture, a Ruger Mark III, and a 6" Taurus .357) for a Springer Mil-Spec. There is no need to tell me how bad this trade was, but I did need a carry gun, and the Springer fit the bill nicely.
Well, it shot like crap, brand new out of the box. I couldn't get a 5" group at 7 yards. I talked to the owner of the shop, and he said the .45 cartridge was too powerful for me to handle. Now, without sounding picky, I am a big boy - 6 foot, 250. I LIKE shooting .44 mag, and .357. I shoot my pt-22 and Beretta Jetfire, with two inch barrels, more accurately than this.
Later, I moved to another state. I asked the guy who owned our range to shoot with my gun. He did, and he grouped awfully, but said military spec guns shot like crap, and it was as good as I could ask for.
I later decided to start 'amateur gunsmithing'. I figured the 1911 was a great platform to learn on, and I had one I didn't care about - I found other guns to carry, because that Springer don't hit the broad side of a barn.
So, I disabled the ILS lock on the Springfield, slicked up the internals, learned how to detail strip it, installed a new mainspring housing and spring, etc. Minor stuff. And I was learning about accurizing...I measured the ID of the barrel bushing, and the OD of the barrel, and it was about .001 difference, and then I was reading about how to fit a match barrel. And evidently, proper fit of the slide to frame is essential.
I found a guy who has a Springer that looks just like mine. Is this type of fit bad? I can actually see daylight through this (pay attention to the left side of the fitment). Does this need to go back to Springfield?