Springfield 1903 Mystery Rifle?

80viking

New member
I recently bought a very nicly sporterized Springfield 1903. It is and older conversion with a minty 2 groove barrel, a Bishop stock, and an Armstrong target peep sight. I thought it was a low number receiver with a sn in the 69,000 range, but now I'm not so sure, because the front receiver ring has no other markings other than the 5 digit sn stamped directly on the top. The receiver has no markings whatsoever other than the sn. The bridge is typical 1903, low with the stripper clip cutout on it.

I had a friend with some Sringfield knowledge take a look at it and he noticed that it had a lot of polishing done to it, inside and out. He felt as though it was not built from an original 1903 military action, but it was a post WWII build from an after market casting assembled with surplus parts.

The thing that led me here was I bought a one piece mount to scope the rifle and the mount is close but does not fit properly in the bridge area.


Any Ideas?

Thanks.........John
 
My idea is that a good set of closeup pictures would let somebody (not necessarily me) help you get a handle on this rifle.

The only postwar cast receiver + surplus parts Springfileld type I know of was the National Ordnance but they were marked as such and were 03-A3 types to boot.
 
I wont comment on it being a low number or not without being able to examine the rifle.

Thousands of '03s were sporterized after civilians got a hold of them from just about everyone who could work a screw driver to master craftsman.

They used a varity of mounts and drilled and tapped accordingly, few were one piece mounts so its no wonder your one piece mount wont work.

I think you're gonna have to go with two piece mounts or drill some more holes.
 
Thanks for the replies. I will try to post some pictures.

The problem with the mount is if it is flat on the front ring there is about 1/16" of space above the bridge. My son is studying to be a machinist. I was thinking of having him cut the front of the mount that ammount instead of shimming the back.
 
We will need pictures.

In the 70's Parker Hale made rifles around 03 bolts. The receivers were cast but the stocks were not Bishop's.

Sedgley bought many rejected low number receivers, ground all identification, and sold low priced sporters.

You can search "Sedgley rifles for sale" and find images of examples.

Lots of 03's were converted into Sporters by unknown gunsmiths since WW1. Some were done very well, others less well.

What these guys did to the receiver rings was all up to them.
 
Here are some pics.

Theres not much to see. Like I said the only markings on the receiver is the sn on top of the ring.

The reciever is all drilled and tapped for the scope. It was suprisingly easy to punch, drill, and tap.

The bolt is marked sa under the root and the barrel has the sn on the side.

Also note the chatter marks in pic #4.

Thanks for looking.......John

rt2ow1.jpg


rt2ow1.jpg


33o5pcp.jpg


2lolsm.jpg


b7za00.jpg


1z4dd38.jpg
 
You did not need to white out your serial number as the pictures are so fuzzy I cannot read them.

I would say that if someone took the time and effort to punch a serial number on the top of the receiver, than that was the original serial number.

After all, who would make up a serial number that was 69,XXX?

Looks like the rifle was drilled and tapped for a Lyman 48S rear sight but the stock is not inletted for the sight.

These old single heat treat receivers have more risk to shoot than later receivers. All of the single heat treat or double heat receivers were made from plain carbon steels, which are inferior in all properties to alloy steels. Incidentally this is true of all WW1 era military rifles, the steels used were not that good.

The problem with single heat treats was that the process controls were so varible that many defective receivers were made, and there was no way to sort good from bad, that in 1927(ish) the Army began to scrap every single heat treat receiver when the rifle came in for a rebuild. These things fail in a brittle fashion if exposed to over loads. I have posted plenty of horror pictures of blown up single heat treats on this forum, search if you want.
 
The only postwar cast receiver + surplus parts Springfileld type I know of was the National Ordnance but they were marked as such and were 03-A3 types to boot.

I've also seen cast 'Federal Ordnance' receivers.
 
Them too.
I found some history on a M1 Carbine website.
Seems many of those folks were in cahoots with each other, or some of the same folks doing business under different brand names.
 
Judging by the ammount of copper that I removed from the barrel, I would say that a fair ammount of 30-06 ammo has been shot out of this rifle. I will be using this one for cast bullets so I'm not very concerned about it.

It got a new bolt handle today and is all together and ready to go. I'll try and get some more pictures.

Thanks for all the input.......John
 
I have a National Ordnance M1903, 1944 RIA barrel. Shoots fine when I do my part.

Having owned one defective National Ordnance M1903A3, I would consider any National Ordnance product to be worth only the sum of its GI parts.

The cast receiver on my rifle was so soft, that the receiver lug seat set back under bolt load. Headspace increased and had I continued to fire it, I would have had a cartridge rupture.

I got rid of the rifle in 1983. When I first purchased it, I took it over to a gunsmith to have the headspace checked. That much I knew. The gunsmith told me that the headspace was excessive. I took it back to the place of purchase. The seller than sent it to a gunsmith who did something. I don’t know what, maybe he cut an extra thread on the barrel.

I don’t remember how many rounds I fired. But it was probably under 200. Might have been less than 100. Early rounds were difficult to extract. Took a bit of effort to raise the bolt. As the number of rounds downrange increased, the more difficult it became to raise the bolt handle. Towards the end, I had to beat the bolt handle to open it. The little light bulb went off in my head and I figured out that the lugs were pounding the receiver seats backward. I was having to size the case with the bolt, to open the bolt. I decided not to shoot the thing anymore.

I traded the rifle plus a RIA double heat treat on a Ruger #1.

A poorly built, improperly heat treated receiver made of inferior materials does not have to telegraph catastrophic failure. It just might let go. Poof!


This guy had one blow up on him due to the soft receiver stretching.

http://forum.pafoa.org/general-2/535...gun-broke.html
The owner reported he had only 76 rounds of factory ammunition before the lug set back caused a cartridge rupture.

The original post was on the old Culver's, which deleted all of its old messages after the update. Luckily I saved the pics.

This young man was very lucky he did not lose an eyeball. I expect he had more facial damage than what you see in these poor camera phone pictures.

And he did nothing that was his fault. He simply fired enough factory ammunition until the National Ordnance receiver failed.

Blownoutleftsidestock.jpg


Blownouttriggerguard.jpg



Rightsideaction.jpg


woodpieceofstockthathitshooter.jpg


Blowncasehead.jpg


bloodonsweatshirt.jpg



This is another account of a National Ordnance which blew up in the gentleman’s face.


http://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=8778&highlight=national+ordnance


This may have been him, or another shooter:

i was the guy who had the National Ordnance 03A3 blow up in my face. I like you am still pushing people away from those ticking time bombs they call rifles. I had one surgery after I last conversed with you. Had to have a tooth removed, piece of brass was blown into my nerve and the sun still burns my eyes from absorbing heat.
http://www.jouster.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2893

Another Gentleman whose father as saved from serious injury by retiring his National Ordnance when he experienced the first signs of case head separation.

http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php?p=6853297&postcount=3

Yesterday, 10:35 PM #3

Chainsaw2
Member


Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 33 Thanks! This thing will get cleaned up and the firing pin removed to be a keepsake. Now that I saw the pictures of that guy with the injury and the ruptured brass I remember the same thing happining to my father. He fired a ball load, and the brass had three evenly spaced hairline ruptures in the same place. The gas blew back and caused the cocking piece to hit his thumb and almost break it. We thought it was an over pressure round, but now I bet it wasn't. He never fired it after that, and I guess it was a good thing. I'd be afraid to fire a cast bullet load in it at 1200 fps.

I'll just find a decent Mauser and use that instead.

Thanks again!!!
jim
 
Well thats not very encouraging.

I still have not identified the receiver, but I will say it is on the soft side.

Are there any known safe 1903 receivers?

I would like to keep my eyes open at the shows, actually I know a guy in NH that specializes in USGI small arms parts.

Thanks for all the advise......John
 
Back
Top