Speaking of anti-gun celebs..
- Thread starter Cowman
- Start date
Love&Hate12
New member
That's good. I think Howard Stern is also pro-gun.
and is gone from Google video...hoghunting
New member
Jguy,
Eva L talked about those facts when she was a guest on The Tonight Show w/Leno. She was promoting the movie.
Eva L talked about those facts when she was a guest on The Tonight Show w/Leno. She was promoting the movie.
steelheart
Moderator
Years ago, I heard Stern say on his radio show that the 2nd Amendment was so old that is is irrelevant to "modern times" and it has no place in "today's society" or words to that effect.
If he is progun now, he's done a 180 degree turn.
They're Libertarians, gun control is a big issue for them. But of course they're just liberal media entertainers that also dislike the Boy Scouts, the death penalty, laws against drugs and prostitution, creationism, and government intrusion on privacy so of course they're couldn't possibly be truly pro-gun.
Sneaky liberals...
Sneaky liberals...
Rich Lucibella
Staff
Stern owns (or has owned) firearms and has talked about range sessions.
But he is hardly "Pro-Gun" for the "masses".
Rich
But he is hardly "Pro-Gun" for the "masses".
Rich
Love&Hate12
New member
Rich -
Being somewhat for citizen arms shows some promise though. Some people don't agree with me saying that a gun safety test for people who already know it and are purchasing their first firearm and a gun safety course for new gun-people would be a good idea. Or a one time licensing that would cover both purchases and concealed carry after the proficiency and gun safety course would be a good idea, any decent person would get it and then could buy anything they want, then private sells would just recquire to show your card. Switzerland has a similiar thing but their license only allows for 3 guns each license issued, and I strongly don't agree with it. I also think a national licensing of some kind could help us open up the machine gun registration somewhat, which would be a lot of fun
That's something that's not unreasonable at all, because gun safety is important and I have seen some shooters every now and then who don't have gun safety down at all.
I hope I don't sound even slightly like an anti-arms person because I think they are some of the most ignorant fools around.
Being somewhat for citizen arms shows some promise though. Some people don't agree with me saying that a gun safety test for people who already know it and are purchasing their first firearm and a gun safety course for new gun-people would be a good idea. Or a one time licensing that would cover both purchases and concealed carry after the proficiency and gun safety course would be a good idea, any decent person would get it and then could buy anything they want, then private sells would just recquire to show your card. Switzerland has a similiar thing but their license only allows for 3 guns each license issued, and I strongly don't agree with it. I also think a national licensing of some kind could help us open up the machine gun registration somewhat, which would be a lot of fun
That's something that's not unreasonable at all, because gun safety is important and I have seen some shooters every now and then who don't have gun safety down at all.
I hope I don't sound even slightly like an anti-arms person because I think they are some of the most ignorant fools around.
Rich Lucibella
Staff
L&H-
There isn't a government that has existed that has been successful in legislating safe human behavior. There isn't a government that has existed who didn't eventually curtail private firearms ownership (including Switzerland). And there isn't a Gun Confiscation program imaginable that didn't begin with licensing legislation or fiat.
The main problem with this nation is that everyone is afraid of everyone else's lack of safety on some issue or another. In conditions like that, .gov needs have no master plan for curtailing Human Rights; the citizens volunteer them freely at the Altar of Public Safety....death/injury stats are seldom affected, but that doesn't matter; it just "feels" more safe.
Rich
There isn't a government that has existed that has been successful in legislating safe human behavior. There isn't a government that has existed who didn't eventually curtail private firearms ownership (including Switzerland). And there isn't a Gun Confiscation program imaginable that didn't begin with licensing legislation or fiat.
The main problem with this nation is that everyone is afraid of everyone else's lack of safety on some issue or another. In conditions like that, .gov needs have no master plan for curtailing Human Rights; the citizens volunteer them freely at the Altar of Public Safety....death/injury stats are seldom affected, but that doesn't matter; it just "feels" more safe.
Rich
Love&Hate12
New member
good points.