Poodleshooter
New member
I noticed an odd thing about safety & training the other day while shooting a rimfire plate match.
The difference is how different people naturally decide where to point a long gun safely, and how/why they were trained to do so. It seems that some folks who learned their first shooting safety in a hunting/field environment tend to use a default position of holding a rifle or shotgun muzzle nearly straight up, in the sky, or at a very high angle-aka "carbine carry" or a variation of either "shoulder arms" or "port arms". If a shooter isn't paying attention, but keeps the muzzle high, this eliminates the problem of ever sweeping anyone nearby with the muzzle if the shooter turns around, but the tradeoff is that a shot discharged would be straight up in the air. Those trained in a more "tactical" environment with static ranges and berms seem to tend more towards keeping weapons pointed at a "low ready" towards whatever backdrop or berm is deemed safe, or towards the ground. This is judged to be the safest course of action on a static range with a defined berm, but the horizontal level of the long gun results in two very bad outcomes if a shooter violates any of the other rules and has an AD: namely sweeping others with the muzzle when they turn or discharging the weapon into the ground with the possibility of a ricochet for those nearby. Note that ADs into the ground and sweeping others with the muzzle were prominently noted in the match procedural violations, presumably because they are the most common dangerous violations.
I noticed that while the range officers were discomforted by a shooter raising the muzzle to a "high ready", I was far more discomforted by a shooter at low ready turning slightly to hear the RO's directions, and swinging the muzzle in an slight arc. In general while in the field or on a range, I don't care for others around me using any type of low ready carry or other barrel towards the ground/horizontal forms of long gun carry that can result in me being muzzle swept, or an AD going into the ground near me. I'd much rather see the muzzle straight up in the sky if an AD occurs when other shooters are in close proximity (a deer drive, walking a field for rabbits,etc).
So oddly enough, the RO mandated safety practices in some dynamic firing line matches (plate matches, 3 gun,etc) give me the heebie jeebies, while I'm pretty comfortable with the same high muzzles that would give most ROs fits. I never get that same feeling with highpower,bullseye matches, or other "static" shooting events. Obviously you follow the rules of the RO, but it still weirds me out.
Anybody else like that, or am I off base completely?
The difference is how different people naturally decide where to point a long gun safely, and how/why they were trained to do so. It seems that some folks who learned their first shooting safety in a hunting/field environment tend to use a default position of holding a rifle or shotgun muzzle nearly straight up, in the sky, or at a very high angle-aka "carbine carry" or a variation of either "shoulder arms" or "port arms". If a shooter isn't paying attention, but keeps the muzzle high, this eliminates the problem of ever sweeping anyone nearby with the muzzle if the shooter turns around, but the tradeoff is that a shot discharged would be straight up in the air. Those trained in a more "tactical" environment with static ranges and berms seem to tend more towards keeping weapons pointed at a "low ready" towards whatever backdrop or berm is deemed safe, or towards the ground. This is judged to be the safest course of action on a static range with a defined berm, but the horizontal level of the long gun results in two very bad outcomes if a shooter violates any of the other rules and has an AD: namely sweeping others with the muzzle when they turn or discharging the weapon into the ground with the possibility of a ricochet for those nearby. Note that ADs into the ground and sweeping others with the muzzle were prominently noted in the match procedural violations, presumably because they are the most common dangerous violations.
I noticed that while the range officers were discomforted by a shooter raising the muzzle to a "high ready", I was far more discomforted by a shooter at low ready turning slightly to hear the RO's directions, and swinging the muzzle in an slight arc. In general while in the field or on a range, I don't care for others around me using any type of low ready carry or other barrel towards the ground/horizontal forms of long gun carry that can result in me being muzzle swept, or an AD going into the ground near me. I'd much rather see the muzzle straight up in the sky if an AD occurs when other shooters are in close proximity (a deer drive, walking a field for rabbits,etc).
So oddly enough, the RO mandated safety practices in some dynamic firing line matches (plate matches, 3 gun,etc) give me the heebie jeebies, while I'm pretty comfortable with the same high muzzles that would give most ROs fits. I never get that same feeling with highpower,bullseye matches, or other "static" shooting events. Obviously you follow the rules of the RO, but it still weirds me out.
Anybody else like that, or am I off base completely?