For anyone thinking about the switch, I don't miss my LCP at all. I wondered how pocketable the G42 would be, but it is fine. I can wear gym shorts, and they don't sag down at all. I added one of my G26 mags to my pocket to simulate the weight of the G43 just to see, and it would be too heavy unless I was wearing a belt, in which case I would carry my G26. I didn't buy the G42 to be my EDC, just for when my dress does not allow me to carry my G26.
Just wanted to share my experience in case this helps anyone else. Now that the G43 is out, the G42's are becoming pretty easy to find. I bought a used one that was test fired in December, 2014 for $380.
Compared to the LCP, I wanted to make the switch for a few reasons: 1) Shootability. The trigger and sights provide the main difference, but the slight increase in size helps this gun to feel better in my hand. I liked the convenience of being able to pocket carry my LCP, but never felt comfortable in my ability to shoot it at anything but point blank range. As I said, pocket carrying the G42 is fine. Probably wouldn't want to go any bigger or much heavier, though. 2) Durability. A Glock requires way less maintenance than a blued gun. I don't have to worry about a little bit of sweat getting on my gun and it rusting. 3) I carry a G26 as my main carry gun, and would rather stick to the same platform. This was not an option when I acquired my LCP. Wasn't sure about the size of the G42 when they came out, and they were overpriced and hard to find, but this is a great little gun. The specs don't do justice to how much smaller this thing feels than a G26.
This post was not meant to be a knock on Ruger or the LCP. Some people love their LCP's and shoot them well, but it was not meant for me. This is mainly to help anyone who is considering making a switch to the G42 from the LCP or similar gun.
Last reason I forgot to mention is, my wife likes the feel of this gun, and hopefully she will enjoy shooting it. If it was for myself only, I know there are pocket 9 options, but she would not enjoy those. I also preferred to stick with the Glock platform. Only the Kahr PM9 seems to compare in weight even though some of the others are the same size.
Just wanted to share my experience in case this helps anyone else. Now that the G43 is out, the G42's are becoming pretty easy to find. I bought a used one that was test fired in December, 2014 for $380.
Compared to the LCP, I wanted to make the switch for a few reasons: 1) Shootability. The trigger and sights provide the main difference, but the slight increase in size helps this gun to feel better in my hand. I liked the convenience of being able to pocket carry my LCP, but never felt comfortable in my ability to shoot it at anything but point blank range. As I said, pocket carrying the G42 is fine. Probably wouldn't want to go any bigger or much heavier, though. 2) Durability. A Glock requires way less maintenance than a blued gun. I don't have to worry about a little bit of sweat getting on my gun and it rusting. 3) I carry a G26 as my main carry gun, and would rather stick to the same platform. This was not an option when I acquired my LCP. Wasn't sure about the size of the G42 when they came out, and they were overpriced and hard to find, but this is a great little gun. The specs don't do justice to how much smaller this thing feels than a G26.
This post was not meant to be a knock on Ruger or the LCP. Some people love their LCP's and shoot them well, but it was not meant for me. This is mainly to help anyone who is considering making a switch to the G42 from the LCP or similar gun.
Last reason I forgot to mention is, my wife likes the feel of this gun, and hopefully she will enjoy shooting it. If it was for myself only, I know there are pocket 9 options, but she would not enjoy those. I also preferred to stick with the Glock platform. Only the Kahr PM9 seems to compare in weight even though some of the others are the same size.