I researching the 6.5 X.284 and the 6.5-06, I was struck by their overt ballistic similarites to the .270.
There is a grand total of .006" worth of diameter difference in the two calibers, and BCs are all but identical.
OK, so why re-invent the wheel with wildcats that offer little if any advantage over a tried and true caliber like the .270?
There is a grand total of .006" worth of diameter difference in the two calibers, and BCs are all but identical.
OK, so why re-invent the wheel with wildcats that offer little if any advantage over a tried and true caliber like the .270?