Snubbies: 637 vs. 360

H

Handy

Moderator
IF I were to go to a lightweight revolver for CC, I've narrowed it down to one of the Smiths (Taurus seems to do okay, but more then a couple reports of really ineffective warranty work has made me decide to pay a little extra.)

I understand the engineering differences and 3 oz weight difference between the Airweight and Airlite gun, but they seem effectively identical:
1) As a backup gun, neither will be fired much, so wear will not be a big factor.
2) Caliber: I was told that, while possible, virtually no one carries .357 loads in these 12 oz Airlites. If both guns will be .38 +P 5 shots, this seems a wash.
3) Price: They are the same gun design, executed in different materials. I understand the quality should be the same. What will that extra $200 net me in reality?


I'm certainly no revolver expert, so I'd like someone to straighten me out if I'm misunderstanding how these little revolvers are employed.


My main question: Why should I pay the extra for the Scandium/Ti guns if they carry and shoot about the same? Or don't they?


Thanks! :)
 
Last edited:
For some folks the 2 ounce weight difference is crucial. Perhaps if hiking and other such activities are in the cards? Or a cop who has to have a BUG whilst saddled with an overloaded duty belt? Folks with severe physical limitations?

For me, I'm still pretty strong and able. I can carry two ounces more. I can't fire the 357 Airlites enough to be proficient with them anyway.

But why the 637 vs 340? 642 vs 340 might be closer. Both are Centennial style guns.
 
The only Caliber I carry in my lightweight alloy pocket rocket are .357's. I admit that when I am at the range, I shoot 38 specials 3x as often but only because they are cheaper and the bruising on my hands is less severe if I stop at 50 rounds.
 
The only Caliber I carry in my lightweight alloy pocket rocket are .357's.
Click to expand...
Why? With that short a barrel, are you getting anything but bruises for your trouble. .357 is designed to develop full velocity in much longer barrels.
 
I find the +p and 357 loads take longer to recover from between shots, where as 38spl loads can be shot much faster and more accurately. I currently use 158gn 38spl flat nose jsp magtech in my 357 snub with a velocity of around 800ft/sec. I think they would do the job. I'm told that hp's don't reliably expand at under 1100 ft/sec. And they can fly all over the place from a snub. not alway accurate, and not just mine, but my father in laws as well. :eek:
 
Airlite vs Airweight

I wanted the Airlite but got the Airweight because I couldn't justify the then price of $100 an ounce in difference. The 642 fits well in my suit pocket and weights about 18 ounces loaded. It shoots OK but is not a range gun and is not intended to be but would do the job as a CCW. For the money get the 642
 
I traded me 640 for a 360 PD last year, and havent looked back. Yes, the 360 PD kicks ALOT worse. It is a SD gun only. I have been an LEO and a competive shooter for 27 years. I do not practice alot with the 360 PD, just enough to remain proficient. I carry it with 145 GRN STHP which chrony at 1225 from this pistol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top