Smith Model 69 in .44 Magnum

rodfac

New member
Picked up a new Smith M 69 last week for the outstanding price of $677 + tax. That's a deal I couldn't resist. Here's a brief range report on it.

Weight was 37.3 oz. One reason that I bought it. I've got a 5" Smith 629 that shoots wonderfully, but it's heavy as a brick on the belt. The same goes for my Ruger Flat Top...great shooters but heavy as all get out. This M 69 feels the same as my 1911's with steel frames and is comfortable with a good pants belt carry. The heavier guns need a dedicated gun belt to be really comfortable.

Trigger pull right out of the box was 4# in single action, about the same as my cherished Ruger Flat Top .44 Specials. A bit heavy for a Smith when compared to my other Smiths. Double action was an estimated 10+ lbs. and will need to be tuned for better defensive shooting. Both are smooth, but a bit heavy. In all honesty, I really don't like a Smith, or any revolver with a 2 lb. trigger. I find that the shot breaks just too soon for me. This one is just right in SA mode...the DA needs some work.

Accuracy from the 15 yard line with a Weaver stance is great. Cast bullet gas check loads with Lyman's 429215 gc and 432244 gc will cut ragged one hole groups if I'm having a good 'eyes' day. Both bullets left no visible leading in the bore, but I did note some with a plain base 240 gr LSWC with the same loads after 15 shots.

With the rear sight bottomed out, the heavier (265 gr) 432244 bullet hits 1.5" high at 15 yds. The lighter (220 gr) 432215 is right at point of aim. Windage is doable, with just 3 clicks right applied to center up my impact points from a two-hand hold. The loads used with Herco, averaged 1050 fps with the lighter bullet and 950 with the heavier.

With 200 gr Hornady XTP handloads at a chrono'd 1350 fps, recoil is quick, but not at all uncomfortable. I was a bit surprised with how good the gun felt with this relatively high speed load. Granted, a 240 gr at the same speed is going to come back a heck of lot harder, I'm happy with the 200 gr XTP for a defense/deer load out to say, 75 yds. Accuracy with this bullet ran just over an inch at 15 yds, Weaver stance.

The grips that came on the gun are smaller for this 'L' frame, than those supplied with the big 'N' frame 629. Recoil with the two cast bullet loads above is about the same as full house to +P loads in a 1911...not unduly heavy, but not cream puff either. You know the gun's shooting an authoritative load but one that allows good controllable follow up shots. I'd say that the 1350 fps, 200 gr XTP is still great from a 2nd shot control standpoint.

Fit and finish are good, no machining marks evident...and I particularly like the flat finish black treatment of the sights, and cylinder latch. Yep it's still got that bloomin' internal lock, but I've had no issues with it engaging in recoil. It's a feature I could do without, but I've got no operational issue with it to date.

I revise this write up as testing continues, and add some pics. I'll be looking for a pair of good, recoil absorbing grips down the road, and will have to build a Tom Threepersons open top OWB holster for it as well.

The pics below show the size difference, especially in the grip area. That last one with the target shows 5-shots in 3/4" at 25 yds. The 2nd target demonstrates a 1 click up elevation change with the same load. As always: that's my load, and it's a stout one, it's been safe in my gun, you should work up to it if interested after consulting a good manual and considering the pressure implications. Remember, this is a .44 Magnum not a .44 Special.

Edit: 5/3/15...found that the holster I'd built for my 5" M629, fits this new "L" frame very well. A bit long for the barrel, but with good security. I like that design which offers good protection for the gun, covers the trigger during the initial stage of the presentation but doesn't hinder speed. I carry at the 4 o'clock (FBI) position for the most part allowing good concealment and a full combat grip while still in the leather. See Pic.

Best regards, Rod











 
Last edited:
The supplied grips work well in that regard, recoil absorption, but are just butt ugly. I'm a walnut and steel kind of guy. Thanks for the info. Rod
 
Thanks for the preview.

I want one too, but like you said - would consider putting some wood grips on it.
 
Last edited:
if I'm having a good 'eyes' day.

You too huh? Getting old sucks.

Nice write up. I've got the exact same 5" 629. Yes, it is a brick to carry. I'm now wanting a tanker-style chest holster for it but they are generally too expensive for my budget.
 
Nice review.

I have two -- bought one in Jan of 2014 and liked it so much added a second a couple of months later. Mine are equipped with the S&W X Frame Hogue grips (linked above by b460x) and they make a big difference comfort wise for me.

I have thoroughly enjoyed these guns (had one out today). The L-Frame just works for me. No problems experienced to date. One has almost 4,000 rnds thru it and the other, a little over 1,600. Both are as tight as the day they were purchased.

Hope you enjoy yours as much as I have mine.

FWIW,

Paul
 
Thanks for the replies, guys....I'll post some loading data as I get more time with it...we have a range right here on the farm so it's fairly easy for me to get some shooting time in. Today's Derby Day in KY so not much is getting done. Best Regards, Rod
 
If they ever make a 3" full lug version I might have to sell my 696, hopefully they don't that'd be a tough decision my 696 is a pre lock.
 
Yep, it's sleeved and I wasn't enthused about that feature. After reading Pearce's review in "Handloader", I decided to take a chance on it. I liked the idea of a lighter wt. .44 Magnum, that rode easier on the hip, but still offered full house Magnum performance when desired.

Like all .44 Magnum users of my experience, I shoot heavy .44 Special loads for the most part. Skeeter Skelton's famous load: 7.5 gr Unique with a 240 gr LSWC gets the lion's share of my use, but I have an equally good load, at the same velocity using Winchester 231. In truth, it's a rare combination that won't do 2" or better at 25 yds from any of my .44's.

HTH's Rod
 
Mav, I'm a fan of the 696 as well...currently I have my #1 son's in the safe downstairs. It's a tack driver with Skelton's 7.5 gr load of Unique and recoil feels similar to this Smith M69. I like 3" bbl'd guns, regularly carry a M60 with that bbl. length, and my wife carried a 3" M36 for over 20 yrs. Rod
 
I put a set of Altamont walnut grips on mine. They don't cover the rear of the grip frame, but feel pretty good even with my heavier loads. The also look a lot better.

Also, I had a leftover 4" Ruger GP100 holster that works well. The bottom stitching had to be opened a bit for the extra 1/4" of barrel length, but it fits like a glove.
 
There aren't many "new" guns that interest me, but the new 69 is one that does. I am SO tempted to buy one, even though I would never shoot anything but 44 Specials in it.

But I just bought an old Model 58, 41 Mag, so I'm trying to cool my jets for one...at least for a while.
 
Thanx Axel...I'll give those grips a look-see. And your holster gives me some ideas as well. I'd quit using a thumb break on ones that I build here on the farm, some years ago. We build them pretty tight to begin with, tight enough to use on horseback in fact. And too, I like to build them long enough in the barrel area that I can leave it open, ensuring good drainage for the debris that accumulates over time, or water for that matter, but still allows you to sit under a tree and not worry about dirt in the muzzle.

Nice rig you've got there. Rod
 
Last edited:
Cajun....I like this Smith just fine, especially the weight. Wish Smith would make it up in a .41 Magnum...and just from an esthetic point of view, in a solid barrel model.

Also Brian Pearce makes a reference to the method of rifling being detrimental to cast bullet accuracy....a big item for me, since that's what I use 90+% of the time. To date I've had moderate success with gas checked bullets of 220 gr and 256 gr (lyman 429215 gc & 42944 gc). 25 yd gps with the 256 gr opened up to a disappointing 2.5". Based on the 200 gr XTP grouping of less than an inch with iron sights at the same distance, I have hopes that with further break in on the barrel, and a thorough cleaning with JB Bore Paste, the cast performance with improve.

In that regard, I have a cpl molds for Keith's original 250 gr LSWC that shoot extremely well in my other .44's, both Special and Magnum. Here's hoping that those will be as good in this light wt. gun.

Best Regards, Rod
 
Last edited:
Paul...Yep this is a great light .44. I find the cylinder dia. makes a difference in carry...sorta like a K frame vs a J frame for CC. My plans now are to make up another Tom Threepersons open top, with as little leather as I can get away with; a high rider on the belt, but still with a significant forward cant for ease of draw. I'll post some pics when I get it done. Rod
 
Did some chrono work with the this load. I uses Federal Lg Pistol Primers with it, plus 8.5 gr. of current production Unique and Starline brass. Here are the numbers.
Velocity avg. for 5-shots = 1020 fps;
Extreme Spread = 23 fps.

By contrast here's what Sierra reported in the handloading portion of their Infinity ballistic program. They used a S&W M24 with a 6-1/2" bbl. to get 950 fps with their 210 gr JHP: CCI 300 caps and Winchester brass. That 70 fps difference is attributed to the difference in components, but I was surprised at 4-1/4" bbl. and a 10 gr lighter bullet actually beat their combination. Go figgur.

As it stands though, 1020 fps from Hornady's 200 gr. XTP should make up for a good CC or close in hunting load.

Best Regards, Rod

 
In 44 Special brass

Working with 8.6 to 8.8 gr of Herco and Lyman's 429244 gc, cast from WW + 1% tin and sized 0.431", using Fed or Win Lg Pistol primers, I got 867 fps and 64 Ext Spd. Groups ran about an inch or a little better for ten shots. No appreciable leading with that Hornady gas check.

Working with Lyman's 429215 gc, sized 0.431", and 8.6 grains of Herco will do 3/4" at 15 yds from a Weaver stance. Again no leading.

Working with a copy of the old H&G 503 mold, sized 0.431", (Keith's original square bottom lube groove one), and the same 8.6 gr of Herco plus a Fed cap gave me 1.5" + at 15 yds Weaver stance, unsupported. This load strings vertically.

I've yet to see a 44, Mag or Special that won't group 429215 gc. More work is needed: a heavier charge of Herco, different sizing, ie. 0.430" vs 0.431+", a softer alloy ie. 1/3 Pb to WW, and of course, I need to move back to the 25 yd line and check 'em all from a solid sitting position.

One thing I haven't done as yet is slug the cylinder throats and bore. Pearce made reference, I think, to current production Smith .44 Magnum throats being somewhat smaller than those years ago. I'll check and report back.

All of the above loads are in In 44 Special brass.

HTH's Rod
 
Back
Top