I read somewhere about somebody who converted a 9x18 blowback action (Makarov) to 9.2x19. Easy conversion, and makes use of 9mm luger cases to load for the pistol without trimming all the brass.
The longer case has a higher capacity and is essentially a 9mm case popping out a slighter fatter bullet. I began researching load data for 9.2x19. It appears some have been attempting to load this round hot, to the bottom end of 9mm luger levels. Of course, a gun chambered in 9x18 isn't designed to handle that.
I understand that in a blowback action the mass of the slide is overcome by the ejecting case. The only way to make a 9x18 gun shoot 9x19 is to significantly increase the mass of the slide.
Some, to cope with the hotter rounds, put much stronger recoil springs into the gun. I hear that this does not effect the function of the pistols intended design. Doesn't recoil spring weight play a part in the blowback recoil system?
Can somebody explain to me why you can't take a blowback action, put a significantly heavier recoil spring in the gun to compensate for slide mass, and shoot loads hotter than intended? Aside from overcoming the mass of the slide, doesn't the recoil spring lower slide velocity and increase resistance of the slide over duration?
Theoretically, I don't understand why if I replaced my standard 17lbs recoil spring to say a 25lbs recoil spring why I couldn't load up rounds in 9mm luger levels.
The longer case has a higher capacity and is essentially a 9mm case popping out a slighter fatter bullet. I began researching load data for 9.2x19. It appears some have been attempting to load this round hot, to the bottom end of 9mm luger levels. Of course, a gun chambered in 9x18 isn't designed to handle that.
I understand that in a blowback action the mass of the slide is overcome by the ejecting case. The only way to make a 9x18 gun shoot 9x19 is to significantly increase the mass of the slide.
Some, to cope with the hotter rounds, put much stronger recoil springs into the gun. I hear that this does not effect the function of the pistols intended design. Doesn't recoil spring weight play a part in the blowback recoil system?
Can somebody explain to me why you can't take a blowback action, put a significantly heavier recoil spring in the gun to compensate for slide mass, and shoot loads hotter than intended? Aside from overcoming the mass of the slide, doesn't the recoil spring lower slide velocity and increase resistance of the slide over duration?
Theoretically, I don't understand why if I replaced my standard 17lbs recoil spring to say a 25lbs recoil spring why I couldn't load up rounds in 9mm luger levels.