One of the best things about the BHP is that Browning has pretty much held the line on quality. So, unlike the products of some manufacturers, a BHP made a year ago is as good if not better than one made ten or twenty years ago. The exception is the trigger, which IMHO used to be made noticeably smoother.
As far as 9mm 1911s are concerned, I have several, all Colts, made within the last twenty years. They're the same quality as Colt's .45 1911s, which means they're good guns overall, but may lack attention to certain details. For instance, half of mine came from the factory with inadequate extractor tension, so they failed to extract or stovepiped from time to time. This was an easy fix. OTOH I owned a 9mm Combat Commander, made around 1980, that wouldn't shoot two rounds without jamming. I got rid of it out of sheer frustration, but now wish I hadn't, because it could probably have been made to work just fine.
Several years ago, Colt's made a run of 1991A1s in 9mm (said to be for the government of Japan). An overrun of these was sold on the civilian market. They were very good basic pistols, and I recommend them if they can still be found for sale anywhere.
I've heard that other 1911 makers (Springfield Armory?) also make 9mm 1911s. But I have no experience with them.
I think most folks would agree that a 9mm 1911 is easier to shoot than a .45 1911, at least as far as recoil is concerned.
HTH.
[This message has been edited by jimmy (edited September 09, 2000).]