Correction, just for the record. The 225 is not a single stack version of the 228. The 228 is a double column version of the 225.
Between the two, 225 was around first and is #1 in my book.
If you carry 2 spare mags, it suddenly becomes a slim high cap w/25 rounds at your disposal. Nevertheless, you'll want to dispose of them in the proper direction. They w/go where they are told to go. Just tell the sight where to point.
Seriously, Stretch. At the shop, hold them both w/your shootin hand and point in safe direction. How does it point and feel in your paw? That is more important than caliber or size when your comparing these apples n apples. I think they should have simply rechambered and made mags for different calibers for the premium 225. .45 Would've been nice. You may have noticed that I have a bias.
If you like your 239 better, I'd just find a new barrel in the other caliber.
As to the "sheet metal" slide of the 225. I'd first try to find someone who has had any breakage or wear problems w/their 225 before I'd worry about it. Those who boast the merrits of their heavy duty stainless steel forged chunks of solid forged 229 slides try to make the German made counter parts (ie. 225) out to be something one step up from aluminum foil. I personally don't think that slide strength is an issue, even if SIG ARMS had taken my advice and made a 225-.45ACP or 45 Super w/long barrel. Dag nabbit, they never listen to me. Sorry, 245 is nice, but not a 225 folks.
robert
ps: If you decide against the 225, would you let me know and tell me how to get in touch w/this dealer?
------------------
"But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." -Jesus Christ (Luke 22:36, see John 3:15-18)
[This message has been edited by EQUALIZER (edited February 08, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by EQUALIZER (edited February 08, 2000).]