I've never seen or shot one, but believe that its scarcity makes it a collectors item. Personally, I believe that for concealed carry, a 225 makes far more sense. The 225 is far more size efficient, just as accurate, and fits the hand better. From all the reports I've heard, most 220s are consistantly more accurate than the Glock. 210 Supposed to be top of the line bar none. But for target shooting, a 220 should do.
Did you know that the common caliber that it was made for is 45ACP? It can also be found, albeit difficult in 38 super. 9mm Was the rarest caliber for the 220. It is oversized by far for the little 9mm, but if you want it for collection purposes, rather than a user, I think its worth it .
robert
------------------
"But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." -Jesus Christ (Luke 22:36, see John 3:15-18)
[This message has been edited by EQUALIZER (edited February 21, 2000).]