.38 Super, 9mm Parabellum, and .380 ACP all use (essentially) the same diameter bullets, but the cases (and chambers) are all different. I have played around with the notion of a 1911 in .380 ACP -- an idea I've seen discussed on the forum at
http://forum.m1911.org/ . I found that trying to shoot .380 ACP from a 9mm barrel (headspacing on the extractor, of course) just didn't work. The 9mm chamber was so much larger that too much energy was lost to blow-by. The bullets left the muzzle, but the slide wouldn't cycle.
The .38 Super chamber is smaller, so I tried that next -- again headspacing on the extractor. Same result. It came closer to cycling, but the slide wouldn't cycle until I cut down the recoil spring to something like 8 pounds. Brass was still deformed after firing, but not so badly it couldn't be resized.
In the end, I used a 9mm barrel and loaded 9mm brass using 95-grain bullets and a light charge to generate .380 ACP velocities. That allowed me to decide what recoil spring would work, but there's just no source for a .380 ACP 1911 barrel so, like the guy on M1911.org, I gave up.
It does show that you can shoot using the extractor to "headspace" the cartridge. It's not unsafe, but it's hard on the extractor and it's not a recommended practice. But you can't shoot a round that's too fat to go into the chamber, and the tapered 9mm cartridge shouldn't fit all the way into a .38 Super chamber.