Shocking study: 25 million more guns helped produce a 40% drop in crime

dZ

New member
Shocking study: 25 million more guns helped produce a 40% drop in crime http://www.lp.org/press/archive.php?function=view&record=158


WASHINGTON, DC -- Gun-related crime has plunged 40% in recent years while the number of guns in circulation has reached an
all-time high, according to a new study by the U.S. Department of Justice -- and that's terrible news for supporters of gun control,
Libertarians say.

"The message is clear: More guns equal less crime," said Harry Browne, the Libertarian Party's presidential candidate. "The biggest
threat to your safety isn't guns; it's politicians who want to restrict gun ownership.

"That's why we need to do everything we can to keep dangerous gun laws out of the hands of politicians like Al Gore and George W.
Bush."

Data released last week by the FBI shows that gunshot wounds inflicted during crimes dropped to 39,400 from 64,100 nationwide
between 1992 and 1997 -- a decrease of 40%.

But during the same five years, the number of guns in America surged to 230 million from 205 million, according to the National
Association of Federally Licensed Firearms Dealers.

"Even street thugs understand what gun-banning politicians don't: Guns deter crime," Browne said. "Americans went on a
gun-buying binge from 1992 to 1997, purchasing 11 million new handguns and 14 million new rifles and shotguns -- and crime
continued to decline.

"Imagine how much further crime would fall if politicians made it easier for more law-abiding citizens to buy guns by repealing
many of the 20,000 gun laws currently on the books."

One immediate target for repeal: State laws preventing Americans from carrying concealed weapons.

"The three most violent cities in America -- New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles -- all have something in common: Gun control,"
Browne said. "According to the FBI figures, these three cities led the nation in murder, armed robbery, and assault. And no
wonder. In those cities, it's illegal to carry a concealed weapon. Democrats and Republicans who refuse to repeal these laws are
painting a target on the backs of innocent Americans."

Browne conceded that other factors -- such as demographic changes, longer prison terms, and an improved economy -- may have
played a role in the drop in crime rates.

"But a dramatic increase in the number of guns didn't cause an increase in crime -- which is what politicians routinely claim when
they spout off about the so-called need to reduce easy access to guns," he said. "In fact, giving ordinary Americans easy access to
guns is apparently what criminals fear most."

Another shocking truth about gun control laws, Browne said, is that even politicians don't favor them -- for themselves.

"Visit the Capitol building in Washington, DC, and notice how many guards are carrying guns," he said. "Politicians say you have to
be disarmed to make America safer, but they don't disarm government employees. Senators and Congressmen may have a
compelling need to defend themselves, but is it really more compelling than your need to defend your home and your family against
criminals?

"Of course not. That's why if I'm elected president I will immediately sign an executive order disarming every single guard on
Capitol Hill -- until Congress fully restores your right to carry a gun."

During the presidential debates, both Bush and Gore emphasized their support for background checks, taxpayer-financed trigger
locks, and enforcing current gun laws, noted Browne.

"Gore and Bush are both promoting the dangerous utopian idea that criminals will suddenly decide to follow whatever laws they
manage to pass," he said.

"But more laws are not the answer. The best solution is to repeal every existing gun control law on the books. The number of guns in
the hands of criminals will not change, but more Americans would recover the right to defend themselves -- which will probably
inspire many more criminals to seek a safer line of work."
 
I'd love to vote for Harry, and I will be voting for all other Libertarian candidates, but until the party builds a firmer lower eschelon base, everything from dog catcher to Governor, they will never get a presidential candidate ito the Oval Office.

Stop spending the money wasted on the Presdidential candidate and spend it more wisely on the lower eschelon that has a better chance of winning.

------------------
Gun Control: The proposition that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own panty hose, is more acceptable than allowing that same woman to defend herself with a firearm.
 
I am by nature and attitude a libertarian. However, I do not appreciate the logic of putting a libertarian in the White House and have no libertarians in the house and senate. I'll consider a libertarian as president only after the libertarians establish a house and senate libertarian caucus.

Too many pols get the big head and think they need to go for the head job. How different would the national debate on impeachment have been if Alan Keyes was in the House or senate or been one of the House managers? How different would the national debate have been on NAFTA if Buchanan was in the Senate instead of running for president.

Let's get libertarians to caucus in a phone booth first, then lets go after the White House.

------------------
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

Barry Goldwater--1964
 
There has long been a contingent within the Libertarian Party that has advanced this same argument, and they have always been outnumbered.

Perhaps, those of you who really think you're "libertarian at heart," and want to stay involved in electoral politics, may want to join up and see if you can change the Party's focus at long last.

Well, that's the argument for joining or staying in NRA, isn't it? ;-)

--The Beez
 
Back
Top