I don't think anyone was trying to figure out how the poster could
break the law... it's just that the laws seem to be blocking what should be a common and easy way of letting a father protect his son.
Father and Son are resisdents of the same state... most likely he can give the gun to his son with out an FFL.... take it from there.
I don't see why you can't give him the gun just because he is in another state or have not already given him the gun last year...
I think we get so locked into this, got to ship a gun to an FFL and there has to be a transfer (paperwork) we sometimes miss the obvious...
Once again before the modirators get their undies all in a wad... I'm not promoting breaking the law.... but their are lawyers out there that get paid to figure out how to 're-interpret' laws.
We aren't discussing how bubba can get his second cousin on this wifes brothers side of the family a gun in WY... but a 'transfer' between a father and son who both live in the same state.
ATF says you can ship a gun to yourself with out an FFL... they also say you can loan a gun to someone with out an FFL...
I'm not a lawyer and have never played one on TV... So,
person asking the question needs to go here and read way down...
http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/faq2.htm#b9