Nickel Plated
New member
SO I got a bit of an issue currently. I bought a handgun on GunBroker. The seller is an FFL in PA. I am a resident of PA. But they are really far away so I decided it would be easier to just have it shipped to a PA FFL closer to me and pay the transfer fee rather than spend an entire day and burning all the gas driving back and forth to get it in person.
The handgun was shipped via USPS. When USPS attempted delivery, it was early in the morning before the receiving FFL was open. So the package went back to the post office. Unlike UPS and FedEx. USPS doesn't do multiple delivery attempts. If you miss it you gotta go to the PO to get it in person. Since the package is addressed to the receiving FFL and not me (I assume. Maybe my name is on it somewhere. Certainly not address), I can't just go get it myself. So I have to call the receiving FFL and see if they will go pick it up. I will try that tomorrow.
If the FFL decides he can't be bothered to go pick it up, I read that they can call the PO and designate me as an "authorized agent" to pick up the package for them, bring it back to the shop and complete the transfer.
Here's the hypothetical. I DO NOT PLAN TO ACTUALLY DO THIS! Just so some of you guys don't get sidetracked on that point.
What if I went to pick up the package, but instead of bringing it back to my FFL to complete the transfer, just said "Welp, I got my gun in hand, the seller has been paid, far as I'm concerned my part in this transaction is over. I'm goin' home with my new gun."
Theoretically would there be any laws broken on the part of any of the parties involved?
Selling FFL: Their only responsibility is to send the gun to a licensed FFL who will complete the transfer. It's not on them to make sure the gun actually makes it there or the receiving FFL actually completes the whole NICS/4473 process for the transfer. So they are legally off the hook and since they already got paid, they have no real dog in the fight. Once the gun is out of their possesion, they really have no reason to care what happens to it at this point.
Receiving FFL: Their responsibility is to log the gun in their bound book when they receive it and complete the NICS/4473 before transferring it to me. Since they never technically received it, it was never in their "possession", and so they are clear of any responsibility for that gun. And since they never had to do a transfer, they are not owed any transfer fees. So again they have no real reason to care about this.
Me: As a private citizen and not an FFL, I am not responsible for ensuring that the NICS/4473 process is followed before I take possession of the firearm. Same as if I bought a gun at a gun show from some dude wandering the show floor. If he happens to be a licensed FFL unbeknownst to me, but decides to just take my cash and hand me the gun, that's his problem not mine. I'm not obligated to ensure he fulfills his responsibilities. So with the gun paid for I'm pretty much clear here.
Perhaps the receiving FFL could put in a claim that their package was stolen. But I think that would be a stretch. For one I became the legal owner of the gun as soon as I paid for it on GunBroker. Even if it wasn't in my "possession" yet. And since they never even got it in their shop, they can't really claim something as stolen if it was never theirs to begin with.
Secondly, I was "authorized" to pick it up. It's not like I broke into the post office in the middle of the night and snuck off with it, so I don't think a "theft" could really be claimed here.
And why would they even bother? They have no legal responsibility for that gun and they are not owed any money. What would be their motivation to go through all that?
Again, I will call the receiving FFL tomorrow when they open and see what they want to do about this. I DO NOT PLAN ON DOING THE ABOVE SCENARIO. I know this would likely be a gray area and do not wish to be a test case.
Just curious what you guys would think of this situation. I always like to go off on theoretical thought exercises.
The handgun was shipped via USPS. When USPS attempted delivery, it was early in the morning before the receiving FFL was open. So the package went back to the post office. Unlike UPS and FedEx. USPS doesn't do multiple delivery attempts. If you miss it you gotta go to the PO to get it in person. Since the package is addressed to the receiving FFL and not me (I assume. Maybe my name is on it somewhere. Certainly not address), I can't just go get it myself. So I have to call the receiving FFL and see if they will go pick it up. I will try that tomorrow.
If the FFL decides he can't be bothered to go pick it up, I read that they can call the PO and designate me as an "authorized agent" to pick up the package for them, bring it back to the shop and complete the transfer.
Here's the hypothetical. I DO NOT PLAN TO ACTUALLY DO THIS! Just so some of you guys don't get sidetracked on that point.
What if I went to pick up the package, but instead of bringing it back to my FFL to complete the transfer, just said "Welp, I got my gun in hand, the seller has been paid, far as I'm concerned my part in this transaction is over. I'm goin' home with my new gun."
Theoretically would there be any laws broken on the part of any of the parties involved?
Selling FFL: Their only responsibility is to send the gun to a licensed FFL who will complete the transfer. It's not on them to make sure the gun actually makes it there or the receiving FFL actually completes the whole NICS/4473 process for the transfer. So they are legally off the hook and since they already got paid, they have no real dog in the fight. Once the gun is out of their possesion, they really have no reason to care what happens to it at this point.
Receiving FFL: Their responsibility is to log the gun in their bound book when they receive it and complete the NICS/4473 before transferring it to me. Since they never technically received it, it was never in their "possession", and so they are clear of any responsibility for that gun. And since they never had to do a transfer, they are not owed any transfer fees. So again they have no real reason to care about this.
Me: As a private citizen and not an FFL, I am not responsible for ensuring that the NICS/4473 process is followed before I take possession of the firearm. Same as if I bought a gun at a gun show from some dude wandering the show floor. If he happens to be a licensed FFL unbeknownst to me, but decides to just take my cash and hand me the gun, that's his problem not mine. I'm not obligated to ensure he fulfills his responsibilities. So with the gun paid for I'm pretty much clear here.
Perhaps the receiving FFL could put in a claim that their package was stolen. But I think that would be a stretch. For one I became the legal owner of the gun as soon as I paid for it on GunBroker. Even if it wasn't in my "possession" yet. And since they never even got it in their shop, they can't really claim something as stolen if it was never theirs to begin with.
Secondly, I was "authorized" to pick it up. It's not like I broke into the post office in the middle of the night and snuck off with it, so I don't think a "theft" could really be claimed here.
And why would they even bother? They have no legal responsibility for that gun and they are not owed any money. What would be their motivation to go through all that?
Again, I will call the receiving FFL tomorrow when they open and see what they want to do about this. I DO NOT PLAN ON DOING THE ABOVE SCENARIO. I know this would likely be a gray area and do not wish to be a test case.
Just curious what you guys would think of this situation. I always like to go off on theoretical thought exercises.
Last edited: