SeeCamp or NAA Guardian?

lawndoctor1

New member
The mag release button on the SeeCamp is located at the very bottom of the grip. The mag release button on the NAA Guardian is on the side beside the trigger guard. I have never shot either pistol,and I'm curious about the mag release on each pistol in regards to accidently hitting the mag release while shooting,causing shooting problems. Please advise?
 
The NAA Guardian would have a faster reload capability (in my opinion). As for which design is better I would look at the guns on the market and see which one is selling the most.
 
i have both and have never had the magazine release accidently release in my pocket while in a pocket holster or while firing in either firearm.
 
It's all but impossible to "accidently" hit the Seecamp mag release while shooting. It's also secure while being carried. That said... during the many years I pocket carried my Seecamp I did on a few occasions, maybe once every 5-6 years, find the mag popped loose, (it moves a fraction of an inch).

The Seecamp is a bit smaller than the NAA. The NAA shoots ball ammo.

I looked at both guns and went with the Seecamp because of it's reputation. I was not disappointed.
 
I have not played with the NAA Guardian. I do have a .25 and .32 Seecamp. Even the .25 is not fun to shoot, BUT FOR THE PURPOSE, I love the Seecamps. Technology has passed them by, but with the right cartridge and the right lube, they are very reliable.

Anyone who thinks the heel release will slow down reloads are not thinking rationally ... there is no way to speedload a Seecamp. This is a pump 'n run pistol. You aren't gonna get into a shootout with a Seecamp.
 
No experience with either, but I would go with the NAA because it has sights and the traditional magazine release. I don't like European mag releases on such a small gun, it makes reloads more time consuming than using speedloaders in a revolver.

Not likely that you'll need to reload, but if you do, seconds count and the NAA will be faster.
 
I have more pocket pistols that I care to admit.
The Seecamp is smaller, sleeker and more "refined" than the NAA Guardian

The Guardian will shoot ball ammo.

The newly released Seecamp .25 is very cool and, will shoot any .25 auto round you can shove in it. (And, you get an extra round)

Neither the seecamp nor the Guardian have ever given me a problem.

The new Remington RM380, though bigger than the Seecamp .380 is actually usable and, is a great little gun. (Over 300 rounds for me now).

The Seecamp and the Guardian in .32...certainly in .380, stop being fun to shoot after about 50 rounds.

The Seecamp .25 can be shot all day as well as the RM380.

If you're gonna get a micro carry gun, the Seecamp is just a wonderful little piece of engineering. I've had my .32 for close to 30 years. The .25 for about a year.
 
My Seecamp was born in 1987. Didn't realize how old it is until reading your post. Time for some cake and ice cream.

I think mine is just barely one year older. I have a "C" serial number.

I guess I should say:

"I've had my Seecamp .32 for over 30 years...."

Didn't even realize I'd had it that long...

http://www.seecamp.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1169272141

Enjoy the cake and ice cream! (I'm trying to low carb...I'll make an exception though :) )
 
I have a "C" serial number.

Mine is a "C" too in the 800s. I guess it's older than I thought if the chart is correct at '85 or '86. Small world.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top