Great info found at the Seecamp Forum website;
http://www.seecamp.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Carried an early LWS32 for many years. It was always reliable. I loaded it with all brands of ammo, Winchester, Gold Dots, Hornady, Fiocchi, Cor Bon and such, all of which fed and fired. The Seecamp is very small and thin making it an ideal pocket gun. I carried it in several holsters, the best of which was a beautiful R.J. Headley.
My favorite holster.
The early mags did have a soft compound in the front. These mags worked but are no where near as high in quality as the current mags, which are a work of art. Later mags used a spacer in the rear to eliminate rimlock which I
never experience with this gun. I did have rimlock in other .32 caliber pistols with poorly designed mags.
I had a friend who always had one in his pocket with a custom serial #, IIRC. That was 30 years ago or so...
Custom serial numbers came later,maybe later than 2005 even.
Clerk said they are all "hand made."
If CNC machines qualify as "hand made" then maybe they are. CNC production began some time after 2005 as well. Prior to that lots of shop/hand tools used. Older Pistols were in effect more hand made as there was a lot of hand fitting.
A change in the strength of the stainless steel used, about serial number 30,000, saw the introduction of the .380 caliber. A true feat of engineering and gun making genius IMHO.
I carried my little Seecamp with great confidence and only stopped recently when a family member trying to find her perfect carry gun asked me for it. I miss my tiny jewel.
Here's a pic of my 1986 "C" serial numbered LWS32 with a PPK/S for a good size comparison.
Here's a comparison of two .380s, a Kel Tec and Seecamp. Show just how small it really is.