• Anything ‘published’ on the web is viewed as intellectual property and, regardless of whether it displays a copyright symbol or not, is therefore copyrighted by the originator. The only exception to this is if there is a “free and unrestricted reuse” statement associated with the work.

    In order to protect our members and TFL from possible litigation, all members must abide by the following new rules:

    1. Copying and pasting entire articles from another site to TFL is strictly prohibited. The same applies to articles from print or other media, and to posting photographs taken of copyrighted pages or other media.

    2. Copyright law provides for “fair use” of portions of a copyrighted work. You can copy no more than a SINGLE paragraph from the article to your post (3 or 4 sentences at most).

    3. You must provide a link to the article along with the name of website. For example: ww.xxx.yyy/zzz (The Lower Thumbsuck Daily News).

    4. You must provide, in your own words, a brief summary of the article AND your reasons for believing it will be of interest to TFL members. Failure to do so may result in the thread being closed or your post being deleted as a “cut and paste drive by.”

    5. Photographs and other images are also copyrighted. "Hotlinking" of images (so that it appears in your message) from other sites is also prohibited unless you own rights to the image. If you wish to share an image, provide a clickable link to it.

    Posts that do not follow these new guidelines will be altered or deleted by staff. Members who continue to violate this policy may lose their posting privileges at TFL.

    Thank you for your cooperation and your participation in TFL, the leading online forum for firearms enthusiasts.

SEARCH Function - Why is Google searching this forum?

D

Dead-Nuts-Zero

New member
I try to use the search function today (FireLine Forum) and everytime it goes into Google giving forum search results.

Never had this problem before. What am I doing wrong?
 
Okay,

I am painfully aware that google is not ideal. In particular, searching for words that occur in a single post is difficult if not impossible, since most google results are threads, and keywords are matched anywhere in the thread. However, that can usually be mitigated by using more specific search terms.

I think that a lot of people who find google search unusable are not giving it a fair chance, or are simply not used to using web search engines.

Google has at least one extremely useful feature that vbulletin doesn't: quoted phrases. You can search for "war on terror," and you won't have to wade through posts where those words are only used separately.

vBulletin search may seem better from your perspective, but how much is that worth to you? Is it worth the forums being perhaps twice as slow (or worse) on average? Is it worth posts and post edits taking dozens of seconds whenever someone else is simultaneously doing an unwise search (like for "gun" or "rifle")?

That's one thing you'll notice about google. It's never slow, and it always works.
 
I use the forum search often, and one thing I liked is reading the many interesting post that I came upon while searching. Now when I search, I leave the forum completly. It's not that I can't use Google, I have used it since day one and use it several times every day for searching something I am looking for.

I think it's a matter of enjoying the searching within our own community and not mixing with the 4997664 trillion-billion search bits that Google banks. I agree the forum search is far from the best way to do efficient searching, but I learned to use it and found it more to my liking as it was "our" search in "our" forum.
Change is difficult for some of us. :cool:
 
There is enough traffic here, that following my own posts is impossible without the detailed search function, which allowed me to quickly find my recent postings.

Therefore, there is no sense in posting. I can't follow up.

Geoff
Who can't justify expending time on TFL without being able to find, quickly and efficiently, my previous posts.
 
Geoff - left click on your name in your post above, a menu should pop up. Select "Find More Posts by ...". Or go to your profile at any time by clicking on your own name in "Currently Active Users" at the bottom of the forum index page and select "Find all posts by ..."

;)
 
tyme,

Does that rant mean you're not working on a way to get the vBulletin search working again?

pax
 
No. I intend to see vbulletin's search fixed (somehow) and re-enabled. I just can't enable it for everyone right now because it'll slow the forums down too much. The consensus is that we're going to try re-enabling it for registered users early tomorrow. It may take a while to re-index everything, but the search page should be accessible during that process.

Rich is getting back from vacation soon. Things will be sorted out one way or another at that point. Not quite a day, but not too much longer.
 
does this mean the data going back to 1999 is still there?

i just went looking for some legacy posts on Clinton and the wide search yielded 30 posts and a search for older than a year yielded nothing

dats not good

:rolleyes:
 
MalH advised, "Geoff - left click on your name in your post above, a menu should pop up. Select "Find More Posts by ...". Or go to your profile at any time by clicking on your own name in "Currently Active Users" at the bottom of the forum index page and select "Find all posts by ...""

Works! Thanks!

Now where's that fine manual I failed to read?

Geoff
Who is embarrassed :o
 
tyme ~

Forgive me if you guys have already thought of this, but seems to me that you might do some good simply by changing the default search pattern from "everything" to "past two weeks" -- including the search pattern from the drop-down menu -- and let people opt out if they need more inclusive results.

Might it help?

pax
 
OK, search is working again...

But...

I just searched on some parameters, and I got 5 recent hits and a bunch of hits from 2002 and back.

Nothing at all between 2002 and the beginning of September.

Please don't tell me that we lost almost 4 years of databased messages...
 
Last edited:
We've not yet re-indexed the forums. That is a very long process that we try to schedule during a slow time.

Your continued patience is appreciated. :)

-Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top