Scout Support Prompts Some Communities to Reverse Funding Withdrawal

USP45

New member
http://www.foxnews.com/national/100500/scoutbacklash_fnc.sml

Scout Support Prompts Some Communities
to Reverse Funding Withdrawal
Thursday, October 5, 2000
Loud support of the Boy Scouts of America has forced some local governments to flip-flop on decisions to break ties with the group over its ban on openly gay leaders and members.

Corbis

Scouts congregate each year at the Boy Scout World Jamboree.



Call it backlash against the backlash.

Tempe, Ariz., officials are scrapping plans to prevent city workers from donating to the Scouts.

"I'm disappointed and angry with myself for the poor process and communication that has ensued," said Mayor Neil Giuliano.

The Tempe controversy started when city officials said they would cut off the area's United Way charity group if it didn't stop funneling money to the Scouts. Local United Way officials told the city it couldn't decide what organizations were worthy of receiving United Way money, and local Scout leaders said they would stick up for values they believed in.

And while about a dozen of the United Way's 1,400 chapters have decided to withhold funding from the Scouts, some chapters are seeking funding alternatives. The Seattle-area United Way will transfer its funds to the Boy Scouts' public school program "Learning for Life," which has open enrollment.

"There are a few places that defunded the Boy Scouts," said Jon Fine of the United Way of King County. "There are plenty of United Ways that let the Boy Scouts alone. And there are a handful like us, who are asking the Boy Scouts to move in a more non-discriminatory fashion and finding ways to help encourage them to do that."

Fine added that the chapter has been "very specific about the expectation that (the funds) be spent in a non-discriminatory manner."

But critics contend that's not going far enough, because the money still helps the Scouts. George Bakan of the Seattle Gay News likened the move to a shell game.

"This program is under shell number one, and this program is under shell number two," Bakan said. "So watch how we move them around and you can still give us money. I don't agree with it at all."

Similar funding battles have occurred in many states since a June U.S. Supreme Court ruling that protected the Boy Scouts' right to exclude gays.

School officials in Miami-Dade County, Fla., last month told local Scout leaders to cancel a recruitment drive in schools, then reversed the decision days later. School district lawyers are planning the next move.

Several organizations have threatened to launch a national tourism boycott of South Florida if local governments there don't reconsider decisions to stop providing money and school-building meeting space to local Scout troops.

The United Way of the Bluegrass will continue funding Scouts in the Lexington, Ky., area, despite efforts by an executive committee member to create a new policy on discrimination.

And the Bethel School Board in Lane County, Ore., plans to reverse its Sept. 11 decision to ban Boy Scout recruiters because it likely would be found illegal if challenged. The board received complaints and its legal adviser said it can't ban Scout recruiters while allowing those from other groups.

Despite the controversy, many businesses and organizations remain supportive of what they say is the Scouts' mission to encourage good deeds and build character. And Scout leaders in several cities said they hoped that would ultimately prevent further funding from being withheld.

— FOX News' Jonathan Serrie contributed to this report


------------------
~USP

"[Even if there would be] few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard, this would simply show that the Founders were right when they feared that some future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may tolerate the abridgement of property rights and the elimination of a right to bear arms; but we should not pretend that these are not reductions of rights." -- Justice Scalia 1998
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>There’s an old cowboy saying, “There’s a lot of things they didn’t tell me
when I joined this outfit!”

Members of TFL can not say that truthfully.

Every TFL member has agreed to abide by the Forum Policies.

We, the Staff of TFL, have been lax in enforcing some of these policies. The results have caused:
- additional workload and storage for the TFL server,
- increased access time to TFL threads for all members,
- additional workload for the TFL Staff, and
- most importantly and worst of all, a remarkable increase in arguments on subjects UNrelated to the TFL
mission, i.e.“... the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership.”

Yes, my friends, that DOES include the General Discussion Forum and the Suggestions, Questions and
Feedback Forum as well as every other TFL forum.

TFL is not a chat room for all of life’s concerns. Sorry, but this is simply more than TFL can handle.

This problem is largely my fault - personally.

I asked Rich and the Staff to permit off-thread discussions to build camaraderie among our members and
thereby strengthen our RKBA movement. Instead, such subjects as religion, abortion, alternative lifestyles,
sports, pets, clothing, and politics (unrelated to firearms/rights), etc. have
encouraged ad hominem attacks, divisive arguments, needless alienation among members, and (sadly)
members being banned.

Some members who have been banned are true supporters of our Right to Keep and Bear Arms, but were
banned for conduct in off-topic threads.

In other words, while some of us (I was involved) had fun with nonsense such as “test” threads, other folks
were fighting about subjects irrelevant to “responsible firearms ownership”. Our RKBA effort has been
strengthened in some areas but unnecessarily weakened in others.

Overall, I believe we have suffered a net loss. Therefore, I must admit the failure of my endeavor. TFL must
return to our RKBA mission and become less involved with the total spectrum of world controversy.

I ask all TFL members to read (or re-read) the Forum Policies. If problems or
questions remain, contact a Staff member by e-mail.

I solicit and anticipate your understanding, cooperation, and assistance.

Thank you,
Dennis
TFL Administrator [/quote]
 
Back
Top