I had the opportunity to examine a Steyr Scout this summer while putting around the Black Hills of SD. FWIW here are my cursory observations:
1. Weight and balance were excellent. The appearance given by the thin, short, fluted, free-floated barrel led me to expect a butt-heavy weight distribution. I was pleasantly surprised at how the overall light heft and balance facilitated rapid mounting to the shoulder without having to make gross adjustments to bring the bore on target.
2. The integral forestock bipod arrangement seemed a little fragile, and less than easy to deploy and return to the stored position. However, I had the same observation of the light-weight plastic-tipped H&K bipod on my 91, but it is still very much in service 21 years later. I suspect the bipod is more than adequate in it's intended role and frequency of use.
3. The pull of the stock was comfortable for me, but would consider removing a strip or two from the buttpad/extension. The comb was also comfortable and well suited to quick sighting with the forward mounted telescope.
4. The butt-stock storage for the spare magazine is not a new concept, however, it is tastefully executed on this rifle. Since I did not have the opportunity to conduct a live fire operational test of the system, I've no basis for comment on the ease of accomplishing a magazine extraction and replacement drill under tactical firing postures and conditions. This should ferret out any ergonometric oversight of the design application.
5. My curiousity is piqued by the barrel configuration. I'd love to hear how well it retains its precision as it heats up under sustained firing. My experience with "whip thin" barrels reflects they are excellent for the first 2-3 rounds, then begin to drift as the barrel harmonics shift commensurate with heat expansion. Is there anybody out there that has any practical shooting experience with the Scout who would care to comment on their experience regarding this?
[This message has been edited by Mykl (edited 10-21-98).]