Jeff Thomas
New member
I always get a bit frustrated by scope decisions. Not enough experience to draw from. But, my eyes are lousy, and I really need the help that good optics provide.
I'll be using a Marlin 1894S .44 Mag for a bear hunt. I'm leaning towards a Leupold 2-7x33 Vari-XII, but I've been heavily influenced by tales of Leupold quality.
1. Should I purchase a larger objective? I want a lot of light-gathering capability, but also want a good cheek weld. Is a 40mm objective too big ... is the 33 a better compromise?
2. I want to find a good balance between having a low enough power for work in the woods, while being able to move up to a higher power when time is available for a more precise shot. Because my eyes aren't great, I shoot very well when I have a good scope, and I really appreciate the improved vision. For this kind of hunting and rifle, is the 2-7 a good choice, or would a 3-9 do just as well? Interestingly, the 3-9 can be a bit cheaper.
3. The Vari-XII seems to be a good compromise. But, are there other scopes of comparable quality, but of lower cost simply because they don't have the Leupold name? In other words, am I being a sap for buying a Leupold scope, when other manufacturers might offer more for less money?
4. Has anyone found a good place on the 'net for scope evaluations? I recognize there are many personal opinions on scopes, but I'm wondering if there are any objective evaluation sources out there.
5. I've mounted a couple of scopes in the past, but that was on a Ruger 10/22 and an air rifle. I've got a gunsmith's screwdriver set. Should I attempt this myself, or use a gunsmith?
Thanks a lot. Optics are so darn expensive ... I don't want to waste a lot of money experimenting, and most guys in the gun stores can't begin to match the quality of opinions I can find on TFL.
Regards from AZ
I'll be using a Marlin 1894S .44 Mag for a bear hunt. I'm leaning towards a Leupold 2-7x33 Vari-XII, but I've been heavily influenced by tales of Leupold quality.
1. Should I purchase a larger objective? I want a lot of light-gathering capability, but also want a good cheek weld. Is a 40mm objective too big ... is the 33 a better compromise?
2. I want to find a good balance between having a low enough power for work in the woods, while being able to move up to a higher power when time is available for a more precise shot. Because my eyes aren't great, I shoot very well when I have a good scope, and I really appreciate the improved vision. For this kind of hunting and rifle, is the 2-7 a good choice, or would a 3-9 do just as well? Interestingly, the 3-9 can be a bit cheaper.
3. The Vari-XII seems to be a good compromise. But, are there other scopes of comparable quality, but of lower cost simply because they don't have the Leupold name? In other words, am I being a sap for buying a Leupold scope, when other manufacturers might offer more for less money?
4. Has anyone found a good place on the 'net for scope evaluations? I recognize there are many personal opinions on scopes, but I'm wondering if there are any objective evaluation sources out there.
5. I've mounted a couple of scopes in the past, but that was on a Ruger 10/22 and an air rifle. I've got a gunsmith's screwdriver set. Should I attempt this myself, or use a gunsmith?
Thanks a lot. Optics are so darn expensive ... I don't want to waste a lot of money experimenting, and most guys in the gun stores can't begin to match the quality of opinions I can find on TFL.
Regards from AZ