Scorch said:
For any handgun, and especially for hunting applications, I recommend no more than 4X unless you are extremely experienced shooting handguns with high magnification scopes. The Burris scopes are very nice and well built. Keep in mind that you want a scope that is designed as a handgun scope, not an extended eye relief (EER) scope designed to be mounted on a rifle. Like this:
http://www.leupold.com/hunting-and-s...x28mm-handgun/
I prefer Leupold, but whatever you buy, make sure it is a good quality scope so you don't wind up like a friend of mine: we recently went shooting, and when we limbered up the old scoped 44Mag, no 2 rounds went to the same place twice in a row. I would have said it could have been us, but I had just finished shooting my iron-sighted 44 Mag and putting 5 out of 6 in a 6" bull at 100 yds. He said he wasn't going to buy a $300 scope, he just keeps buying the $120 scopes and sending them back to the factory for service when they break.
Thank you very much for the reply! I *do* have a question about the available eye-relief of the Leupolds as the couple few *I* have been able to actually see seemed to be a bit `short' or `long' for *me*. In your experience have you found that they may be understating this? (For any of you who may have experience with the Burris products are they possibly `overstating' *their* eye-relief?)
I had already pretty much decided that I didn't want too much magnification because of some previous `playing around' with some other optics in the past. The 2-5X `figure' was something I figured would be an *extreme* that I really wouldn't want to use on a regular basis. It's nice to see that I am on a `correct course'! (I've been using one model of a 6-18X44 Swift rifle scope on my `varmint' rifles for years now and I have never gone much further magnification-wise than about 12X and usually find myself someplace between 8X and 10X the majority of the time with the occasional excursion down to 6X on the `close in' shots.)
I, too, have a friend who likes to try and `scrimp' on his scopes no matter how many problems he has with the `cheapies'. So far he has spent, easily, 3 - 4 times what it would have cost him in the first place to buy a good quality scope on every rifle he has scoped before he finally either breaks down and buys a good scope or he comes up with all sorts of other excuses for his troubles and gets rid of both the rifle and the cheapy scope. Then, to top things off, he turns around and buys another rifle and goes through the whole danged `dance' all over again!
In the case of my XP-100 I *want* to be able to *not* be worrying about my `tools' and only worry about *me*. I have always figured that if one buys quality inheritantly accurate `equipment' then all one has to deal with is the one thing that is the easiest thing to `change' and `improve'. The person behind the sights and trigger! (Yeah, there can be times when there can be problems with the `tool', like having a set of cross-hairs coming `un-hinged', tube or optics getting damaged from carelessness, a `bad' or `improper' batch of ammo, or somesuch `other' `glitch' that can cause problems. But, in my almost 50yrs of shooting, the majority of the `problems' *I* have run across can usually be attributed to `the loose nut behind the trigger'. *Especially* if the `tool' / `gun' and the rest of the `system' has inherent quality and accuracy to begin with.) I cringe when, at a range, I run across someone who comes out to `sight in' their rifle just before the start of hunting season and after doing so proclaims that "they are now ready" yet when asked about how much time they have spent actually shooting they also proclaim that they only do so during hunting season hunting whatever it is they are going hunting for. Quite a few of these yaahoos are enough to make me want to not even bother going out because I don't want to be *anywhere near* to where they are.
I like to shoot for many reasons but, two of the main ones for me are relaxation and improving myself. I've found that I can `un-wind' quite easily by sitting down at a range and `punching holes in paper at long distance' than I can just about any other way. Every time I go out to a range, even if it may not be one of my `best' days, I also find that the next time out I am actually usually shooting better than I've done before. It's like my old piano teacher always used to exhort me, "Practice, practice, and practice some more and you *will* get better. If you don't then you will always only be mediocre at best and horrible at the worst." With firearms this is even more important as far as I am concerned. (My children have always complained about me being such a `slave driver' when we are out on a range. But, the last couple times we have gone varmint hunting *both* of them finally realized that they were pulling off shots they wouldn't have been able to do in the past. One could almost *see* the proverbial `light bulb' light up above their heads and afterwards, on the way back home, they *both* actually thanked me for `driving' them like I have been doing! To me that `thanks' is worth more than all the `riches' of the world!)