Schumer & Feinstein - carrying is okay for them, but not for We The People

progunner1957

Moderator
From Jews For the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, www.jpfo.org, we are presented with insight into the minds of gun-banners such as Senators Schumer and Feinstein.

These dyed-in-the-wool socialist/leftists don't hate guns; they hate the concept of the common man owning and carrying guns. As members of the "enlightened" elite, it is their right to carry guns while the rest of us are forbidden to do the same - or so they think.

Schumer & Feinstein -- They Aren't Hypocrites At All
We've received a flurry of letters regarding revelations that Senator Charles Schumer has a concealed weapons permit, as does Senator Dianne Feinstein. Given their historical anti-gun stance, doesn't this make them hypocrites?

Absolutely not, says JPFO.

Schumer, Feinstein and their ilk firmly believe that government officials and agents should have access to firearms, but civilians should not. They are arrogant people who believe that elected officials and their agents are better, smarter, more important and more trustworthy than the citizens.

That is the view of socialism -- rule by "experts" because the people cannot arrange their own affairs. Naturally, the "experts" need to be protected against the commoners, who (they believe) are typically stupid and dangerous.

No, neither Feinstein nor Schumer are hypocrites. They are simply tyrants who believe that the laws they impose should only apply to the rabble. The real question is why such a clear double standard is tolerated in America, where all citizens are supposedly equal.

The answer? Because Americans don't understand their rights. They believe that any policy, legislation, or regulation is by definition "lawful"...that is to say, Constitutional. But we know better. And as more Americans learn the true meaning of the Bill of Rights, so will they.
 
And?

You, we, expected what? Fairness :rolleyes:

Do as they say, not as they do. They are our "parents" now, just do as you are told.

Simple as that. They are our betters, they are smarter then we, they have our best interest in mind.

Wayne
 
These cretins enact all sorts of laws and exempt themselves. This is just another example.

With very few exceptions, the entire populations of Washington DC and Hollywierd Kalifornia could disappear and the country would be far better off.
 
Again, I quote the words of former Senator Bill Bradley of New Jersey who, in his retirement speech in 1995, after attacking the Republicans for their
limited government-free market approach, then said "The Democrats think the
government is the answer to everything and they prefer the bureaucrat they
can control to the consumer they can't understand." In Ocean County, New Jersey a few years ago a cop went on a shooting spree with a department issued submachine, the story barely got local coverage, I doubt if it got any
national coverage, led to no thundering editorials in the liberal press about the need for "gun control", to get "the weapons of war off the streets." A member of the NYPD killed his wife and kids before turning the gun on himself
a few years ago, the news story in the NY Times said "It was not clear if a department issued weapon was used."
Can you say "Double Standard?"
 
Last edited:
You guys don't really think that Schumer and Feinstein actually care about this issue do you? I'm willing to bet that they would agree with us that these regulations are silly and pointless. The problem is that making such regulations is what gets them reelected by people who do believe this garbage. In fact, I'm willing to bet that many Anti- politicians don't want to solve the problem. After all, if there's no longer a problem then there's no longer any use for this person and no reason to reelect them or give them any more money. In other words, they have to perpetuate the problem in order to justify their own existance.
 
Back
Top