<Donning abestos suit>
I'll cut to the chase, I've really only handled an "AK" twice in my life. Contrary to by beliefs and what I had been told the rifle had pretty good "fit and finish", was VERY reliable, and I found I could hit a 200 yard target with relative ease.
I later found out that the AK I used was a Yugoslavian AK-47.
One thing that stuck in my mind was the beauty of the rifle.
Last year I got a chance to fire a SAR-2 (Romanian) it was fairly inexpensive, BUT I noticed it heated up, and after a couple of thirty round magazines (NOT rapid fired) it started to "heat up", even through the wooden grips.
One thing that I like about the AK is the 7.62X39mm round and the abundance of it currently on the market. So I'm looking for an AK chanmbered in this round.
My thoughts however always come back to that Yugolslavian AK (looked like it had a thicker barrel than the SAR-2).
Does anyone know if you can still get them, how much would it cost for a "PC" one and if not what would a good replacement be?
Thanks for the reply!,
Jon
I'll cut to the chase, I've really only handled an "AK" twice in my life. Contrary to by beliefs and what I had been told the rifle had pretty good "fit and finish", was VERY reliable, and I found I could hit a 200 yard target with relative ease.
I later found out that the AK I used was a Yugoslavian AK-47.
One thing that stuck in my mind was the beauty of the rifle.
Last year I got a chance to fire a SAR-2 (Romanian) it was fairly inexpensive, BUT I noticed it heated up, and after a couple of thirty round magazines (NOT rapid fired) it started to "heat up", even through the wooden grips.
One thing that I like about the AK is the 7.62X39mm round and the abundance of it currently on the market. So I'm looking for an AK chanmbered in this round.
My thoughts however always come back to that Yugolslavian AK (looked like it had a thicker barrel than the SAR-2).
Does anyone know if you can still get them, how much would it cost for a "PC" one and if not what would a good replacement be?
Thanks for the reply!,
Jon