Ok, this is rather odd to me. I have read some of the following:
1. Ti-Scan revolvers are strong enough to handle "full power" .357/.41.44mag loads.
2. However I have also read that SAAMI spec on .357/.41.44mag has been reduced from 46,000/43,500/43,500 cup (as listed by my Speer #11) to a rumored 33-36,000 cup...
IF the above are true, then technically the Ti-Scan revolvers "can" handle current level SAAMI max spec...but could such Ti-Scan revolvers handle old-skool pressures?
I got a look at one of the new S&W 357PD revolvers (in .41 mag) as well as the 329PD (.44mag). I question whether or not these are viable hunting weapons at all. IF they can only handle the newer SAAMI cup pressures then that:
a. Limits even a reloaders ability to maximize the power of the cartridge for hunting purposes...
b. Makes me question why S&W even bothered to produce such a handgun at all (other than trail-side bear defense...)
Comments anyone?
(PS: I rather like the 357/329 revolvers...I just can't quite figure if they are viable for hunting purposes...)
1. Ti-Scan revolvers are strong enough to handle "full power" .357/.41.44mag loads.
2. However I have also read that SAAMI spec on .357/.41.44mag has been reduced from 46,000/43,500/43,500 cup (as listed by my Speer #11) to a rumored 33-36,000 cup...
IF the above are true, then technically the Ti-Scan revolvers "can" handle current level SAAMI max spec...but could such Ti-Scan revolvers handle old-skool pressures?
I got a look at one of the new S&W 357PD revolvers (in .41 mag) as well as the 329PD (.44mag). I question whether or not these are viable hunting weapons at all. IF they can only handle the newer SAAMI cup pressures then that:
a. Limits even a reloaders ability to maximize the power of the cartridge for hunting purposes...
b. Makes me question why S&W even bothered to produce such a handgun at all (other than trail-side bear defense...)
Comments anyone?
(PS: I rather like the 357/329 revolvers...I just can't quite figure if they are viable for hunting purposes...)