Hey folks - new here on TFL although I have lurked many times. What brings me here is a more generalized knowledge base in all things firearm.
So here's the meat of the question I have. I went in to a new LGS that specializes in more "exotic" weapons. On teh wall I see an AK pistol with a folding stock. So it's always been my understanding that putting a stock on a pistol makes it an SBR. A practical example of this is I have a Steyr pistol that has a cavity in the grip to attach a stock.
So I asked the HMWIC (head mutha what's in charge) what the story is and he tells me that there was a ruling that a stock can be considered a disability accessory.
Whoa.... if that's true then why have an SBR category at all?
So I have a more than passing interest since I was thinking about building a 300 AAC SBR.
Any learned facts or opinions on this?
So here's the meat of the question I have. I went in to a new LGS that specializes in more "exotic" weapons. On teh wall I see an AK pistol with a folding stock. So it's always been my understanding that putting a stock on a pistol makes it an SBR. A practical example of this is I have a Steyr pistol that has a cavity in the grip to attach a stock.
So I asked the HMWIC (head mutha what's in charge) what the story is and he tells me that there was a ruling that a stock can be considered a disability accessory.
Whoa.... if that's true then why have an SBR category at all?
So I have a more than passing interest since I was thinking about building a 300 AAC SBR.
Any learned facts or opinions on this?