Gosh, there are always trade-off and sounds like you have done a bit of homework on this subject. I personally would recommend a Savage and if you were leaning toward a 77/22, I wouldn't have a problem with this either. In fact, there are few current makes that I would have a problem with. What I do have a problem with, are people who put one against another. It's a matter of personal choice. If there were any serious issues with the Savage, I would certainly say so.Im kind of leaning towards a Savage, but Im open to any suggestions
I agree that the 77/2 is better, but you can buy 2 or 3 MKII's for the price of the Ruger. The Ruger is in a totally different price range.I don't understand why everyone here gets so excited about the savage mkII line. I bought an FSS mkII for my nephew and really am not impressed by it at all. The ruger 77/22 I have sitting next to me is a much better rifle in almost every regard.
The ruger 77/22 I have sitting next to me is a much better rifle in almost every regard.