San Francisco 'Fights Crime' By Disarming Victims, Says SAF

No, no, ya'll here just don't understand.

On Jan. 1, 2006 all the gangs, the criminals, the rapists and all the scum is going to be standing in lines across SF just wanting to turn their guns in. Don't you see, it's now against the law for them to have them and they don't wish to become even more criminal don't you see :barf: .

I feel for the ones that voted agaist the ban and lost but here is what I think, if the morons that voted for it and allowed it to pass want it, then let them have it. They made their beds, let them lie in it.

They will get no sympathy from me. When the real blood starts flowing in the streets (unlike the blood that DOESN'T flow when a state becomes Shall Issue) then let them swim in it.

They think they have a problem with homicides, rapes, gay bashing, Assaults and armed robbery is bad now..... well, let them find out what real life is really like when you're disarmed and can do nothing but become prey.

Wayne
 
Man, as an aspiring criminal who was packing up to move to SF to prey on the now helpless citizenry, I was stopped in my tracks by this new "homicide prevention council." D#$m you Daly, d#@m you!!
 
I was reading in the paper

The other day when 'Tookie' got injected. The unsolved homicides in San Fran is 80% for the year of 2005. No arrest's, nothing.:eek:

Harley
 
I'm glad

I'm not a SF LEO. Seems likely the BGs can (and will) now retaliate against unarmed off duty police officers.
 
Back
Top