Saf Condemns Abc News Fraud In Report On Sunset Of 'assault Weapons' Law

nralife

New member
SAF CONDEMNS ABC NEWS FRAUD IN REPORT ON SUNSET OF 'ASSAULT WEAPONS' LAW


NEWS RELEASE


The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) today called on ABC News anchor Peter Jennings and correspondent Bill Redeker to admit the network distorted fact during a report on the end of the so-called "assault weapons" ban that aired Wednesday evening, Sept. 8.


During that segment, video footage from the North Hollywood bank robbery shootout in March 1997 showed the robbers firing full-automatic weapons, suggesting that this type of firearm will be legal when the ban expires at midnight Sept. 13. These guns had been illegally modified, yet ABC News left the impression that such rifles will be available to the general public.


"Such firearms were illegal prior to the ban, and will be illegal after it sunsets, and ABC knows it," said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb. "ABC's research on this story was either incredibly poor or deliberately distorted. There is no other explanation. It's the same distorted reporting we saw in 1994, prior to the ban, in which the press faked footage in an attempt to portray ammunition from these guns as explosively lethal.


Reporter Redeker made an issue out of certain cosmetic features that were affected by the ban, specifically folding stocks and flash suppressors. He lamented that folding stocks make these rifles more "concealable" and the flash suppressor makes it harder to spot a shooter at night.


"These cosmetic features have nothing to do with how a particular firearm functions," Gottlieb stressed, "or how lethal it might be. That is why the 1994 ban - which only affected the appearance of these guns, not their operation - was nonsense to begin with.


"Rather than explain the law, or note federal studies that have determined this ban, as well as other gun control laws, were ineffective in reducing crime, ABC News sensationalized, and as a result fictionalized, what this ban did and what will result from the law's sunset," Gottlieb concluded. "That's not simply irresponsible reporting. It's journalistic fraud, and ABC News, Jennings and Redeker should apologize for it."


The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 600,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. SAF has previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners, a lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers & an amicus brief & fund for the Emerson case holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.


-END-

--------------------------
I didn't see where this has been posted yet. If it has, please lock this thread. But not before you click the link and let ABC have a piece of your mind. lol

Link to ABC News Nightline Web Comment site
 
Hmmmm, I thought a "flash suppressor" was designed to reduce muzzle flash and reduce temporary blindness to the shooter at night. Also,to kick up less dust and debris when fired close to the ground.

If you are on the receiving end of weapon with a flash suppressor, you most certainly will see the muzzle flash at night.

Anybody disagree with the above?
 
Good on SAF! I think I shall send them some money. They called a spade a spade - that is outright journalistic FRAUD and Jennings the other schmucks at ABC know it. moa, you're right....the truth matters little to those that facilitate the gun-banners agenda.
 
I disagree with you moa. Flash suppressors work two ways. First they help as you described, to help reduce muzzle flash that can cause nightblindness issues for the shooter. The reduced flash also makes it a little harder to pick out where the shooter is. In effect, it reduces the shooter's signature. Large flashes draw much more attention than small flashes.

The same sort of issue holds with using noise suppressors on supersonic ammo out of rifles. The report may be reduced down to 120 db from 155 with a god suppressor, but 120 db is far from silent and the snap of the sound barrier being broken produces additional sound. What the suppressor does in that regard is to make it harder for the shooter to be located by the noise created by the gun. Softer sounds draw less attention than louder ones and are harder to pinpoint than louder sounds.

A flash suppressor does not make you invisible to your enemy, but if they aren't already looking at you when you pull the trigger, the reduced muzzle flash is not going to give them as much help with locating you as a large muzzle flash would do. Both flash and noise suppressors held to make the shooter more clandestine in certain types of circumstances.

Very good on the SAF!
 
"That's not simply irresponsible reporting. It's journalistic fraud, and ABC News, Jennings and Redeker should apologize for it."

NO!

They should be stripped, beaten, tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail, and never allowed to report "news" again ! :mad:

They make a big deal about Bush lying about WMDs in Iraq, but they seem to think they can lie with impunity.
 
Back
Top